Generative engine optimization without the hype. How ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI features choose sources, what the evidence supports, and what it does not.
50 posts, newest first. Page 1 of 2.
Tags in this track:GEOAEOAI VisibilityAI SearchSEOprogrammatic SEO
Latest in GEO & AI Search
Most teams treat LLM output as deterministic. We measured 180,000 responses across four AI engines for 18 months and found the opposite: visibility drops 30% overnight, and the engines agree on 11%.
Read the article
Paid AI placement sits beside the answer. Organic citation sits inside it. Buyers read them differently, and that asymmetry should drive the split.
Ninety days is enough to fix crawler access, baseline measurement, and restructure your ten highest-value pages. Week by week.
Twelve weeks of planning, sponsor outreach, campus marketing, developer acquisition, and judge selection: what makes a hackathon worth remembering.
One prompt becomes many retrievals. You compete in each and see only the one you targeted, which is how top rankings produce no citation.
Dozens of people cancelled Claude subscriptions over a feature with no effect on their rankings. What the watermark actually is, why the copyright argument circulating about it is backwards, and the constraint that was binding all along.
Google's official 2026 guidance says optimizing for AI search is still just SEO. Meanwhile Semrush's own data shows just 51% domain overlap between AI Mode and organic results.
Most AI search statistics have no traceable source. These 50 name the producing organisation, the period, and the method, verified September 2026.
Adobe does not make impulsive acquisitions, yet it put a ten-figure price on a discipline critics were still calling fake. Acquisition prices are the most honest signal in tech.
ChatGPT layers citations onto an answer. Perplexity builds the answer from citations. The four engines are not one surface.
Over 90 days I tracked how six AI search engines cite sources across 50,000+ B2B software responses. The data broke several assumptions the GEO industry treats as settled, starting with the idea that AI visibility is one thing you can optimize for.
The crawl and authority layer is unchanged. Retrieval moves from page to passage, and the outcome moves from click to citation.
Black Hat and DEF CON pull millions in marketing spend to Las Vegas this week. AI engines that buyers ask afterward do not weigh booth size. They weigh whether your research is structured, specific, and citable.
AI does not read your page. It retrieves a fragment and decides whether that fragment answers the question on its own.
llms.txt is a proposal, not a standard. No major AI company parses it, and 97 percent of the files get zero requests.
About two dozen AI crawlers matter in 2026. They split into three classes, and your security team has blocked several without telling marketing.
Eight out of ten cold emails now describe my company correctly. Eighteen months ago it was three. Nobody ran a rebrand.
Reddit, USA Today and Reuters are weighing whether to cut Google off. Most of the numbers from that story were corrected a day later. What the breaking crawl bargain means for B2B SaaS, and why blocking is a negotiating position rather than a plan.
LinkedIn says GEO is a grift. Corporate job boards say it is a salary band up to $171K at Stripe, SailPoint, AWS, and Citizens Bank. I break down what these companies actually hire for, and why this looks exactly like the cloud and email revolutions did fifteen years ago.
The structured data that gets cybersecurity vendors cited by AI: five JSON-LD schema types, plus how to reference CVEs, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and NIST controls as extractable entities.
Marketing says GEO is theirs. Comms says it belongs to them. SEO assumes it's the next chapter of their job. They're all partly right, and the fight itself is the symptom of a deeper confusion: GEO spans layers no single team owns. Here is a model that resolves it.
For decades, Gartner and Forrester shaped enterprise buying. Now buyers ask ChatGPT and Perplexity before they ever open a Magic Quadrant. Here is how analyst influence is actually shifting, and what it means for how companies build credibility.
When a buyer asks an AI engine whether your product supports something, the answer often gets grounded in your documentation, not your marketing. Most companies treat docs as a cost center. In the AI search era, your documentation is one of the highest-value visibility assets you own.
When you name a feature something clever that no buyer would ever type into ChatGPT, you make your product harder to surface for the exact question it answers. Feature naming has always been positioning. Now it is discoverability, and product managers own it.
Traditional impressions on our properties fell 10-20% this year. AI search visibility rose 35%. That inversion is not a problem to fix; it is the new shape of B2B discovery, and the AI channel brings better-qualified buyers. Here is the data and what it means.
Eleven sub-portals plus the apex blog. Here is how they interlink for AI search, what each surface owns, the editorial architecture, and the practical stack I run them on.
You can check whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews mention your brand for free, in your browser, in about a minute. Here are the free AEO/GEO visibility checkers and Chrome extensions worth using in 2026, what each measures, and how to turn a score into a plan.
SEO became a craft because you could reverse-engineer one ranking function. GEO can't work that way: you're optimizing against many non-deterministic models with probabilistic citation behavior. That makes GEO experimental science, and it should be run like a product team runs experiments.
Crawl budget is no longer a technical SEO footnote. Google's AI surfaces draw from the same Search index as the blue links, so whether you appear in an AI answer reduces to whether Google crawled, indexed, and kept your pages fresh.
The entire GEO industry treats AI visibility as a marketing problem: track citations, optimize content, report share of voice. That framing is why most GEO programs plateau. The deeper truth is that GEO is a product discipline, and the teams winning at it have figured that out.
A practical AEO playbook for 2026: how Answer Engine Optimization differs from SEO and GEO, the homepage and entity schema that makes a brand citable, the content patterns AI answer engines quote, and an experimentation roadmap to measure citation share.
New writing on identity, AI security, and building software, delivered when it ships. No tracking pixels, no funnels, unsubscribe with one click.
