Amazonfines & penalties
Amazon.com, Inc.
The largest Western e-commerce and cloud company, owner of Alexa and Ring. Its record includes the largest GDPR fine ever issued (Luxembourg) and a $2.5B FTC dark-patterns settlement over Prime.
- Penalties
- 7
- Total imposed
- ≈ $4.6Bexcludes annulled
- Largest
- $2.5B
- Span
- 2017 to 2025
Penalties by year
Every recorded penalty
7 penalties
Amazon · Prime · 2025
Amazon's $2.5B FTC settlement over Prime dark patterns
The FTC settled claims that Amazon tricked consumers into enrolling in Prime through deceptive sign-up flows and made cancellation deliberately difficult, an internal process nicknamed Iliad. The settlement comprised a $1B civil penalty and $1.5B in refunds to about 35 million customers.
Amazon · 2021
Amazon fined €1.13B over logistics self-preferencing (Italy)
Italy's AGCM found that Amazon tied key seller benefits, such as the Prime badge and better visibility, to using its own logistics service (FBA), disadvantaging rival logistics providers.
Amazon · 2021
Amazon's record €746M GDPR fine (Luxembourg)
Luxembourg's CNPD fined Amazon for processing personal data for behavioural advertising without valid consent. It was the largest GDPR fine at the time and has been under appeal since.
Amazon · 2017
Amazon's €250M Luxembourg tax order, later annulled
The Commission ordered Luxembourg to recover tax advantages from Amazon, but EU courts annulled the decision, a ruling made final in 2023. It is included for completeness given its prominence.
Amazon · 2020
CNIL fines Amazon €35M over advertising cookies
The CNIL fined Amazon for placing advertising cookies on amazon.fr visitors' devices without consent or adequate information.
Amazon · Alexa · 2023
Amazon's $25M Alexa settlement over children's recordings
The FTC settled claims that Amazon kept children's Alexa voice recordings indefinitely, against COPPA and parents' deletion requests.
Amazon · Ring · 2023
Amazon's $5.8M Ring settlement over camera access
The FTC settled claims that Ring employees and contractors improperly accessed customers' home camera videos, and that lax security allowed outside access.