Consumer Deception fines
Misleading users about products, prices, or their own controls.
These cases involve misleading marketing or hidden behaviour: fake privacy controls, undisclosed device throttling, or misrepresented product claims. They are often brought by consumer-protection regulators and state attorneys general rather than data or competition authorities.
13 penalties · ≈ $18.1B imposed
13 penalties
Meta · Instagram · 2026
Meta to pay at least $12.1B, up to $17.1B, to settle 51 attorneys general child-safety claims
Fifty-one state and territory attorneys general settled claims that Meta designed Instagram and Facebook to be addictive for minors, knowingly exposed young users to mental-health harm, and misled the public about how safe its platforms were. Meta will pay a guaranteed $12.1B over ten years, rising to $17.1B if other major social platforms agree to adopt the same safeguards.
Amazon · Prime · 2025
Amazon's $2.5B FTC settlement over Prime dark patterns
The FTC settled claims that Amazon tricked consumers into enrolling in Prime through deceptive sign-up flows and made cancellation deliberately difficult, an internal process nicknamed Iliad. The settlement comprised a $1B civil penalty and $1.5B in refunds to about 35 million customers.
Google · 2026
Google fined €890M in the first Digital Markets Act ruling on self-preferencing
The European Commission found that Google gave its own shopping, hotel, transport, and sports results preferential ranking over third-party services in Google Search, and separately blocked Android app developers from telling users about cheaper purchase options outside Google Play. The €890M total splits into €460M for the search conduct and €430M for the Play Store conduct.
Meta · Instagram · 2026
New Mexico wins $942M against Meta over child exploitation and teen mental health
New Mexico became the first US state to beat a major technology company at trial over harm to young people. A Santa Fe jury found that Meta made false or misleading statements about platform safety and engaged in unconscionable trade practices that exploited the inexperience of children, and the court then added a $567M remedial award on top of the $375M in civil penalties.
Apple · 2020
Apple's up-to-$500M Batterygate class-action settlement
Apple agreed to a US class-action settlement of up to $500M, roughly $25 per affected iPhone, over the same undisclosed performance throttling.
Google · 2022
Google's $391.5M location-tracking settlement
Forty US states settled claims that Google misled users into believing location tracking was off while it kept collecting location data through other settings such as Web & App Activity. It was the largest multistate privacy settlement at the time.
Meta · 2025
Meta's €200M DMA fine over 'pay or consent'
In one of the first Digital Markets Act fines, the Commission found that Meta's pay-or-consent model forced Facebook and Instagram users to either pay a subscription or accept full data combination for personalised ads, without a genuine less-data alternative. Meta adjusted the model after the decision.
X (Twitter) · 2022
Twitter's $150M FTC penalty over 2FA phone numbers
The FTC and DOJ penalised Twitter, now X, for using phone numbers and email addresses collected for account security, such as two-factor authentication, to target advertising.
X (Twitter) · 2025
X fined €120M in the first Digital Services Act penalty
The European Commission found three transparency breaches at X: the paid blue checkmark deceives users because anyone can buy verified status without being verified, the advertising repository is neither searchable nor complete, and researchers are blocked from the public data the DSA requires platforms to share.
Apple · 2020
Apple's $113M Batterygate settlement with 34 states
Thirty-four US states settled claims over the hidden iPhone throttling, separate from the consumer class action.
Apple · 2020
Apple fined €25M over undisclosed iPhone throttling
France's DGCCRF fined Apple for failing to tell consumers that iOS updates could slow older iPhones to manage aging batteries, part of the wider Batterygate episode.
Google · 2012
Google's $22.5M FTC fine over Safari cookie tracking
The FTC penalised Google for circumventing Safari's default cookie-blocking to track users for advertising, despite telling those users they were protected. It was a record FTC civil penalty at the time.
Apple · 2020
Apple fined €10M over iPhone water-resistance claims
Italy's AGCM fined Apple for misleading marketing about iPhone water resistance and for refusing warranty service on water-damaged phones.