SSOJet
Last verified 2026-04-17 · Reviewed by guptadeepak
Editorial verdict
SSOJet has emerged as a credible modern CIAM for B2B SaaS that needs Enterprise SSO + SCIM without paying WorkOS or Auth0 prices, with a product surface and DX that matches the developer-first tier. The 100k MAU free tier plus per-organization billing makes the unit economics genuinely competitive. The trade-offs are a younger ecosystem and narrower B2C feature set; for B2B-first SaaS that doesn't need consumer flows, SSOJet deserves shortlisting alongside WorkOS, Frontegg, and Auth0 B2B.
Last verified by @guptadeepak on 2026-04-17.
At a glance
- Best for
- Mid-market B2B SaaS that needs Enterprise SSO + SCIM at predictable per-org pricing
- Pricing
- per-organization
- Free tier
- 100,000 MAU
- Deployment
- cloud-saas
- SOC 2 Type II
- Yes
- Passkeys
- Native
- Self-host
- No
- Open source
- No
Funding & business
- Funding model
- Bootstrapped
- Total raised
- None
- Latest round
- None disclosed
- Years in business
- 1 yr
- Profitable
- Not disclosed
Early-stage enterprise-SSO startup (founded 2025); no disclosed institutional funding.
Funding data from primary source. See also the CIAM investor landscape.
Strengths
- B2B SSO product surface that competes directly with WorkOS at materially lower price points for mid-market SaaS.
- Modern API design and idiomatic SDKs across major languages, strong DX without enterprise-vendor friction.
- Generous free tier (100k MAU on the auth product) plus per-organization billing keeps costs predictable through scale.
- Pre-integrated SAML / OIDC / SCIM for the major IdPs (Okta, Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin, JumpCloud).
Limitations
- Younger product than WorkOS or Auth0, smaller customer base, fewer Stack Overflow answers, less battle-tested at very large enterprise scale.
- B2C-grade features are limited, no first-class progressive profiling, weaker adaptive risk decisioning, no native bot detection at the level of Auth0 or Cognito.
- No FGA / Zanzibar-style fine-grained authorization.
- Compliance footprint is solid for B2B SaaS but lacks FedRAMP and direct PCI DSS attestation.
Capability matrix
Every vendor scored on the same axes. See the methodology for criteria.
| Password authentication | Yes |
|---|---|
| Social login | Yes |
| Magic links | Yes |
| SMS OTP | Yes |
| Email OTP | Yes |
| TOTP (authenticator app) | Yes |
| Push MFA | No |
| WebAuthn / passkeys | Yes |
| Biometric | Yes |
| Hardware security keys | Yes |
| SAML SSO | Yes |
| OIDC SSO | Yes |
| OAuth 2.0 SSO | Yes |
| Enterprise federation | Yes |
| Passwordless-only flows | Yes |
| Adaptive MFA | Partial |
| Step-up auth | Yes |
| RBAC | Yes |
|---|---|
| ABAC | Partial |
| ReBAC | No |
| FGA engine | No |
| API authorization | Yes |
| Fine-grained permissions | Yes |
| Self-service registration | Yes |
|---|---|
| Progressive profiling | Partial |
| Self-service account | Yes |
| Bulk user import | Yes |
| Admin user search | Yes |
| Custom user metadata | Yes |
| Organizations / tenants | Yes |
| Multi-tenancy | Yes |
| REST API | Yes |
|---|---|
| GraphQL API | No |
| SDKs | js, node, react, next, python, go, ruby, java, dotnet |
| CLI | Yes |
| Terraform provider | Yes |
| Local emulator | No |
| Extension model | Webhooks + JWT customization + custom branding |
| Bot detection | Partial |
|---|---|
| Breached password detection | Yes |
| Brute-force protection | Yes |
| Anomaly detection | Partial |
| Log streams | Yes |
| Audit logs | Yes |
| GDPR data export | Yes |
| PII minimization | Partial |
| Post-quantum roadmap | No |
| MCP support | No |
|---|---|
| OAuth 2.1 | Yes |
| Dynamic client registration | Yes |
| Agent vs human token separation | No |
| Web Bot Auth | No |
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes |
|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | Yes |
| ISO 27018 | No |
| HIPAA | Yes |
| PCI DSS | No |
| GDPR | Yes |
| CCPA | Yes |
| FedRAMP | No |
| EU data residency | Yes |
| Consent management | Partial |
|---|---|
| Preference center | Partial |
| Purpose-specific consent | No |
| Integrates with CMPs | n/a |
Pricing
| 10,000 MAU | $0/mo |
|---|---|
| 100,000 MAU | $99/mo |
| 500,000 MAU | $1,200/mo |
| 1,000,000 MAU | $2,800/mo |
- B2B SSO connections billed per-organization per-month at standard tier
- SCIM Directory Sync included in standard B2B tier
- Custom branding, audit logs, and webhook delivery included at all paid tiers
Estimates use the standard assumptions in our methodology. Always confirm with the vendor.
Best for
- Mid-market B2B SaaS that needs Enterprise SSO + SCIM at predictable per-org pricing
- Teams comparing WorkOS but seeking a lower price point or different commercial structure
- Apps where the buyer is the IT admin and the customer is the organization
- B2B SaaS that wants the SSO + SCIM checklist without paying enterprise CIAM prices
Not for
- Pure B2C consumer apps with progressive profiling, bot defense, and adaptive MFA needs
- Workloads requiring FedRAMP or PCI DSS direct attestation
- Authorization-heavy apps requiring Zanzibar-style FGA at scale
FAQ
- How does SSOJet compare to WorkOS?
- Similar product scope (B2B SSO, SCIM Directory Sync, audit logs, Organizations) at materially lower price points for mid-market SaaS. WorkOS has the larger customer base and more mature compliance footprint; SSOJet competes on pricing, DX, and per-organization billing structure. The two are the closest direct comparison in 2026.
- Does SSOJet support B2C consumer auth?
- Yes for basic flows (magic links, social, OTP, passkeys), but the product is B2B-first and lacks the progressive profiling, advanced fraud signals, and adaptive risk decisioning that mature B2C platforms ship. For pure consumer apps, look at Auth0, Stytch, MojoAuth, or Descope.
- What does SSOJet cost at 100 enterprise customers?
- At 100 B2B customers each with their own SSO connection, expect roughly $1,000–$2,000 per month at standard tier, materially less than WorkOS or Auth0 at the same scale. Always confirm with a custom quote at this tier; volume discounts apply.
Sources
- SSOJet Pricingaccessed 2026-04-22
- SSOJet Documentationaccessed 2026-04-22
What SSOJet is
SSOJet is a 2025 entrant with a precise scope: ship Enterprise SSO and SCIM Directory Sync for B2B SaaS, fast, with modern DX and predictable per-organization pricing. Its product surface spans Organizations, audit logs, custom branding, JWT customization, and broad auth methods including passkeys, positioning it as a credible modern alternative to WorkOS for mid-market B2B SaaS that needs the enterprise checklist without enterprise-vendor pricing.
Where SSOJet wins
The B2B SSO economics are the headline. WorkOS prices SSO connections per-organization per-month; SSOJet's equivalent tier is materially lower at comparable feature footprint, with a 100k MAU free tier on the underlying auth product. For a B2B SaaS shipping enterprise customers, this changes the unit economics meaningfully, especially in the 20-to-200-customer range where Enterprise SSO is the gating sales requirement.
The DX is modern in a way that matters. Idiomatic SDKs across major languages, a real CLI, Terraform provider, webhook delivery, JWT customization, none of the legacy enterprise CIAM friction. Pre-integrated SAML / OIDC / SCIM for the major identity providers (Okta, Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin, JumpCloud) means most customer onboarding is configuration, not engineering.
For B2B-first SaaS the product surface aligns cleanly with what IT admins ask for in security questionnaires, Enterprise SSO yes, SCIM yes, audit logs yes, SOC 2 yes, without the surrounding scope that B2C-broad CIAM vendors include and charge for.
Where SSOJet hurts
Maturity is the lasting trade-off. SSOJet is a younger product than WorkOS, Auth0, or Frontegg, with a smaller customer base and less battle-tested behavior at very large enterprise scale. For mid-market SaaS this rarely matters; for buyers selling to Fortune 500 customers with hard compliance and federation requirements, the longer track record of incumbents weighs.
B2C-grade features are limited. No first-class progressive profiling, weaker adaptive risk decisioning, and bot defense at the level of Auth0 or Cognito. SSOJet supports the consumer auth methods (magic links, social login, OTP, passkeys) but the product is not designed to be the primary CIAM for a high-volume consumer app.
There's no Zanzibar-style FGA, no first-class agentic identity / MCP support, and no FedRAMP or PCI DSS direct attestation. For workloads requiring any of these, look elsewhere.
How SSOJet compares
The most direct comparison is SSOJet vs WorkOS for the modern-B2B-CIAM call. For broader B2C + B2B coverage from a single platform, Auth0, MojoAuth, and Stytch are alternatives. For B2B with deeper enterprise federation breadth, WorkOS, Frontegg, and Auth0 B2B remain the established choices.
Editorial changelog (1 entry)
Full profile review: capability matrix, TCO bands, and editorial verdict re-verified against current public sources.