Auth0 vs SSOJet.
Last verified 2026-08-19
When Auth0 wins
- Full B2C plus B2B surface, FGA, and the largest SDK community
- Packaged agent identity: Auth0 for AI Agents and Auth for MCP
- FedRAMP High via Okta; SSOJet has no FedRAMP
- Adaptive MFA, bot detection, and progressive profiling SSOJet still rates partial or missing
When SSOJet wins
- Transparent connection-based pricing from $99/month, no MAU tax, for companies adding logos quickly
- SCIM and audit logs on the paid tier without Auth0's upmarket gating
- The cheaper landing when the only Auth0 line item you use is Enterprise SSO
Both win
- Both support WebAuthn. Neither is passwordless-native (Auth0 3/5, SSOJet 3/5)
- Both support social login
- Both have SOC 2 Type II
Pricing comparison
| MAU band | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 MAU | $240/mo | $0/mo |
| 100,000 MAU | $1,200/mo | $99/mo |
| 500,000 MAU | $4,500/mo | $1,200/mo |
| 1,000,000 MAU | $9,500/mo | $2,800/mo |
Developer experience & lock-in
Editorial 1–5 scores and migration effort, on the same axes for both. Lower migration effort is better (easier to adopt, less lock-in).
| Signal | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| DX overallDeveloper experience | 5/5✓ | 4/5 |
| Docs qualityDocumentation | 5/5✓ | 4/5 |
| Passkey orchestrationPasskey / WebAuthn depth | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Adoption effortMigrating in | Moderate | Easy✓ |
| Lock-in (exit effort)Migrating out | Involved | Moderate✓ |
Enterprise readiness
Computed across the enterprise pillars from the capability matrix. See the enterprise-ready pillars.
| Pillar | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Enterprise-ready · 100 | Enterprise-ready · 97 |
| Enterprise SSO | 100 | 100 |
| Directory sync (SCIM) | 100 | 100 |
| Organizations & tenancy | 100 | 100 |
| RBAC & custom roles | 100✓ | 85 |
| Audit logs & streaming | 100 | 100 |
| Compliance certifications | 100 | 100 |
| Security posture | 100✓ | 85 |
Side-by-side capability matrix
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| Password authentication | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Social login | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Magic links | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SMS OTP | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Email OTP | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| TOTP (authenticator app) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Push MFA | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| WebAuthn / passkeys | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Biometric | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Hardware security keys | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| OIDC SSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| OAuth 2.0 SSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Enterprise federation | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Passwordless-only flows | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Adaptive MFA | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Step-up auth | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| RBAC | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| ABAC | ~ Partial | ~ Partial |
| ReBAC | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| FGA engine | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| API authorization | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Fine-grained permissions | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| Self-service registration | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Progressive profiling | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Self-service account | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bulk user import | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Admin user search | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Custom user metadata | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Organizations / tenants | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Multi-tenancy | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SCIM provisioning | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| GraphQL API | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| SDKs | 16 listed | 9 listed |
| CLI | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Terraform provider | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Local emulator | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Extension model | Actions (Node.js serverless) | Webhooks + JWT customization + custom branding |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| Bot detection | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Breached password detection | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Brute-force protection | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Anomaly detection | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Log streams | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Audit logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| GDPR data export | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| PII minimization | ~ Partial | ~ Partial |
| Post-quantum roadmap | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| MCP support | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| OAuth 2.1 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Dynamic client registration | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Agent vs human token separation | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Web Bot Auth | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| ISO 27018 | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| HIPAA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| PCI DSS | Level 1 (with config) | ✕ No |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| CCPA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| FedRAMP | High (via Okta) | ✕ No |
| EU data residency | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| Consent management | ~ Partial | ~ Partial |
| Preference center | ~ Partial | ~ Partial |
| Purpose-specific consent | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Integrates with CMPs | 2 listed | n/a |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-region deployment | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Data residency control | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Proven at high scale (1M+ MAU) | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Capability | Auth0 | SSOJet |
|---|---|---|
| Password-hash import | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Lazy / just-in-time migration | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Account linking & dedup | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Custom domains per brand | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Per-brand theming of all flows | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Per-brand consent partitioning | ~ Partial | ✕ No |
| Deletion webhooks / cascade | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Event streaming / webhooks | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Documented rate limits | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
FAQ
- Is SSOJet an Auth0 alternative?
- For B2B SSO and SCIM, yes. For mixed B2C plus B2B, FGA, agents, or FedRAMP, no. Teams that try to run a consumer app on SSOJet will rebuild the surfaces Auth0 already sells. That is the same trap as using WorkOS as a full CIAM.
- Which is cheaper, Auth0 or SSOJet?
- SSOJet, on a B2B logo-count shape. Public list from $99/month, no MAU tax. Auth0 is about $1,200/month at 100k MAU and about $9,500 at 1M on Compass assumptions, before extra connections. If the volume is consumer logins, SSOJet's price does not map. Use MojoAuth or Cognito for that job.
- SSOJet vs WorkOS vs Auth0 for enterprise SSO?
- SSOJet for transparent connection pricing. WorkOS for mature Admin Portal and FGA. Auth0 when SSO is one feature on a full CIAM, not the product. See SSOJet vs WorkOS for the B2B-only pair.
- Should I switch from Auth0 to SSOJet?
- Switch if the bill is enterprise SSO connections and you do not need consumer CIAM. Do not switch to save money on a B2C app. Budget 60 to 90 days for Actions and Organizations rewrites.
Auth0 is how you buy a complete customer identity platform. SSOJet is how you buy the SSO checkbox without the MAU curve. Treating them as substitutes because both speak SAML is how RFPs stall.
Choose Auth0 when the app is mixed B2C and B2B, you want FGA or agent SKUs, or FedRAMP is on the sheet. Choose SSOJet when you sell to IT, the Auth0 invoice is connection-shaped, and you can live without consumer fraud tooling.
If you need the mature Admin Portal, compare SSOJet vs WorkOS before you land here. If you need native passkeys, look at MojoAuth or Stytch, not this pair.
Profiles: Auth0, SSOJet. Ranking: best CIAM 2026.