Skip to content

Beyond Identity

Last verified 2026-04-13 · Reviewed by guptadeepak

enterpriseb2b-saascloud-saasenterprise-quote

Editorial verdict

Beyond Identity is the most security-forward passwordless platform in 2026, hardware-attested device identity bound to TPM / Secure Enclave goes beyond stock WebAuthn, and the Policy Engine for adaptive risk decisioning is among the most capable in the enterprise tier. The trade-offs are enterprise-only commercial structure (no public pricing) and additional enrollment friction from the device-binding model. For enterprise security-conscious deployments, particularly with FedRAMP or workforce IAM adjacencies, Beyond Identity is a top pick. For mid-market or low-friction B2C, look elsewhere.

Last verified by @guptadeepak on 2026-04-13.

At a glance

Best for
Enterprise security-first deployments wanting hardware-attested passwordless beyond stock WebAuthn
Pricing
enterprise-quote
Free tier
None
Deployment
cloud-saas
SOC 2 Type II
Yes
Passkeys
Native
Self-host
No
Open source
No

Funding & business

Funding model
Venture-backed
Total raised
$205M
Latest round
Series C · $100M · 2021
Years in business
6 yrs
Round led by
Evolution Equity Partners
Profitable
Not disclosed

Founded by Netscape's Jim Clark and TJ Jermoluk; $100M Series C at a $1.1B valuation.

Funding data from primary source. See also the CIAM investor landscape.

Strengths

  • Pioneering passwordless architecture, uses asymmetric keys bound to TPM / Secure Enclave, going beyond stock WebAuthn for hardware-attested device identity.
  • Strong enterprise positioning with FedRAMP Moderate authorization and HIPAA support.
  • Policy Engine for adaptive risk decisioning is among the most capable in the enterprise tier.
  • Founded by Jim Clark (Netscape), name carries weight in enterprise security buying conversations.

Limitations

  • Enterprise quote-based pricing with no public rates excludes mid-market evaluation.
  • The hardware-attested device identity model adds enrollment friction that can hurt B2C consumer flows.
  • Smaller customer base than larger enterprise CIAM (Auth0, Ping, ForgeRock).
  • B2C consumer flows are less developed than B2B and workforce.

Capability matrix

Every vendor scored on the same axes. See the methodology for criteria.

Authentication
Password authentication No
Social login Yes
Magic links No
SMS OTP No
Email OTP Yes
TOTP (authenticator app) Yes
Push MFA Yes
WebAuthn / passkeys Yes
Biometric Yes
Hardware security keys Yes
SAML SSO Yes
OIDC SSO Yes
OAuth 2.0 SSO Yes
Enterprise federation Yes
Passwordless-only flows Yes
Adaptive MFA Yes
Step-up auth Yes
Swipe table horizontally →
Authorization
RBAC Yes
ABAC Partial
ReBAC No
FGA engine No
API authorization Yes
Fine-grained permissions Partial
Swipe table horizontally →
User management
Self-service registration Yes
Progressive profiling No
Self-service account Yes
Bulk user import Yes
Admin user search Yes
Custom user metadata Yes
Organizations / tenants Yes
Multi-tenancy Yes
Swipe table horizontally →
Developer experience
REST API Yes
GraphQL API No
SDKsjs, node, react, ios, swift, android, kotlin, python, java, dotnet
CLI Yes
Terraform provider Yes
Local emulator No
Extension modelWebhooks + Policy Engine for risk decisioning
Swipe table horizontally →
Security
Bot detection Yes
Breached password detection No
Brute-force protection Yes
Anomaly detection Yes
Log streams Yes
Audit logs Yes
GDPR data export Yes
PII minimization Yes
Post-quantum roadmap Partial
Swipe table horizontally →
Agentic identity
MCP support No
OAuth 2.1 Yes
Dynamic client registration Yes
Agent vs human token separation No
Web Bot Auth No
Swipe table horizontally →
Compliance
SOC 2 Type II Yes
ISO 27001 Yes
ISO 27018 No
HIPAA Yes
PCI DSS No
GDPR Yes
CCPA Yes
FedRAMPModerate
EU data residency Yes
Swipe table horizontally →
Consent & privacy
Consent management Partial
Preference center Partial
Purpose-specific consent No
Integrates with CMPsn/a
Swipe table horizontally →

Pricing

Estimated monthly cost (USD)
10,000 MAUQuote required
100,000 MAU$5,000/mo
500,000 MAU$16,000/mo
1,000,000 MAU$28,000/mo
Swipe table horizontally →
  • Enterprise quote-based pricing; no published per-MAU rates
  • Workforce IAM and CIAM products are commercially separate
  • Beyond Identity's Secure Customers (CIAM) and Secure Workforce (IAM) share the same passwordless architecture

Estimates use the standard assumptions in our methodology. Always confirm with the vendor.

Best for

  • Enterprise security-first deployments wanting hardware-attested passwordless beyond stock WebAuthn
  • Regulated industries needing FedRAMP Moderate plus passwordless
  • Workforce IAM use cases where Beyond Identity's device-binding shines

Not for

  • Mid-market or startup deployments without enterprise-quote tolerance
  • B2C consumer apps prioritizing low-friction signup over device attestation
  • Self-hosted deployments

FAQ

How is Beyond Identity different from stock WebAuthn / passkeys?
Beyond Identity uses asymmetric keys bound to the device's TPM (Trusted Platform Module) or Secure Enclave, with hardware attestation that proves the credential lives on a known device. This is a stronger guarantee than synced passkeys (which trust the cloud password manager) and is well-suited to regulated workforce and high-assurance customer scenarios. The trade-off is more enrollment friction.
Does Beyond Identity have public pricing?
No, all deployments are enterprise quote-based. Expect five-figure annual minimums typical for the segment. For mid-market or startup evaluation, the lack of public pricing is disqualifying.
What's the relationship between Beyond Identity's Customer and Workforce products?
Both are sold separately but share the same hardware-attested passwordless architecture. Secure Customers is CIAM; Secure Workforce is IAM. Organizations buying both benefit from architectural consistency and unified policy.

Sources


What Beyond Identity is

Beyond Identity launched in 2020 with founders including Jim Clark (Netscape) and a security-forward thesis: stock WebAuthn / passkeys trust the cloud password manager, but enterprise scenarios often need stronger guarantees, hardware-attested device identity bound to TPM or Secure Enclave that proves the credential lives on a specific known device. The product splits into Secure Customers (CIAM) and Secure Workforce (IAM) sharing the same passwordless architecture.

Where Beyond Identity wins

Hardware-attested device identity goes beyond stock WebAuthn for high-assurance scenarios, useful in regulated industries, workforce identity, and any scenario where device-binding matters more than enrollment friction. The Policy Engine for adaptive risk decisioning is among the most capable in the enterprise tier. FedRAMP Moderate authorization plus HIPAA covers most enterprise compliance needs.

Where Beyond Identity hurts

Enterprise-only commercial structure, no public pricing, five-figure annual minimums typical, professional services-oriented onboarding. The hardware-attested model adds enrollment friction that can hurt B2C consumer flows. Smaller customer base than large enterprise CIAM incumbents.

How Beyond Identity compares

The closest comparisons are Auth0 vs Beyond Identity for the enterprise-passwordless call and Beyond Identity vs Stytch for the passkey-orchestration call. For workforce IAM with similar device-binding posture, products outside this CIAM-focused index are alternatives.

Editorial changelog (1 entry)
  1. Profile reviewed: capabilities, pricing, and verdict checked against current public sources.

Last verified by @guptadeepak on 2026-04-13.