Skip to content
Cybersecurity · Security Awareness Training

Top 5 Security Awareness Training Platforms of 2026

Security awareness training compared: KnowBe4, Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuide, Mimecast Engage, and Huntress Managed SAT.

By ·Aug 15, 2026·11 min·5 tools compared
Security Awareness TrainingPhishing SimulationHuman Risk ManagementCybersecurityCompliance Training

Quick Comparison

PlatformBest ForPricing ModelStandout CapabilityIdeal Org Size
KnowBe4Broadest content library plus AI-driven automation$1.30-$2.35/user/month across 4 tiers (Silver-Diamond)AIDA agentic AI suite, Diamond tier onlySMB to large enterprise
HoxhuntMeasurable behavior change past the compliance-checkbox stageCustom, reported contracts from ~$10,000/yearGamified adaptive-difficulty phishing simulationSecurity-mature mid-market to enterprise
Proofpoint ZenGuideEnterprises already running Proofpoint email securityCustom enterprise pricing, quote-onlyNexus People Risk Explorer risk-signal integrationLarge enterprise on the Proofpoint stack
Mimecast EngageMimecast email security customers wanting a bundled add-onCustom, Engage Core / Engage Pro tiersElevate Security-based risk scoring plus short-form video cadenceMimecast customers, mid-market to enterprise
Huntress Managed SATSMBs and MSPs with no dedicated awareness-training staffPer-learner/month, volume-tiered, billed annuallySub-10-minute setup, fully managed programSMB and MSP-managed clients

KnowBe4

Best For
Broadest content library plus AI-driven automation
Pricing Model
$1.30-$2.35/user/month across 4 tiers (Silver-Diamond)
Standout Capability
AIDA agentic AI suite, Diamond tier only
Ideal Org Size
SMB to large enterprise

Hoxhunt

Best For
Measurable behavior change past the compliance-checkbox stage
Pricing Model
Custom, reported contracts from ~$10,000/year
Standout Capability
Gamified adaptive-difficulty phishing simulation
Ideal Org Size
Security-mature mid-market to enterprise

Proofpoint ZenGuide

Best For
Enterprises already running Proofpoint email security
Pricing Model
Custom enterprise pricing, quote-only
Standout Capability
Nexus People Risk Explorer risk-signal integration
Ideal Org Size
Large enterprise on the Proofpoint stack

Mimecast Engage

Best For
Mimecast email security customers wanting a bundled add-on
Pricing Model
Custom, Engage Core / Engage Pro tiers
Standout Capability
Elevate Security-based risk scoring plus short-form video cadence
Ideal Org Size
Mimecast customers, mid-market to enterprise

Huntress Managed SAT

Best For
SMBs and MSPs with no dedicated awareness-training staff
Pricing Model
Per-learner/month, volume-tiered, billed annually
Standout Capability
Sub-10-minute setup, fully managed program
Ideal Org Size
SMB and MSP-managed clients
1

KnowBe4

Best Overall

Best for: Broadest content library and AI-driven training automation for teams that can afford top-tier pricing

KnowBe4 remains the default pick for most buyers because no competitor matches its content library depth or its benchmarking data pulled from millions of trained users worldwide. The 2026 AIDA agentic AI suite is a genuine leap over calendar-based campaigns, autonomously planning and personalizing simulations at the individual level. The catch: AIDA and the AI-native pitch that defines KnowBe4's 2026 positioning are Diamond-tier features, so the product in the demo is not necessarily the product in your contract.

Pros

  • Largest security awareness content library in the category, with benchmarking data drawn from millions of users worldwide
  • AIDA agentic AI suite (12 agents planned for 2026, including Phishing Agent, Template Generation Agent, and a Deepfake Training agent) automates simulation generation and personalized remediation
  • PhishER and PhishML create a shared threat-intelligence loop: real employee-reported phishing feeds back into what training gets assigned
  • Virtual Risk Officer, giving org/group/user-level risk scoring, is included on every tier, not an upsell
  • Four-tier pricing (Silver, Gold, Platinum, Diamond) lets budget-constrained teams start cheap and grow into AI features later

Cons

  • AIDA's AI-native personalization and Training Content Level III are gated to the Diamond tier, so Silver and Gold buyers don't get KnowBe4's headline 2026 differentiator
  • Reviewers still describe day-to-day operation as campaign-configuration work unless AIDA Orchestration is fully adopted, and that capability is newer and less proven than the core training library
  • Per-seat pricing climbs quickly below volume-discount thresholds, penalizing smaller headcounts
Honest Weakness: AIDA's agentic automation, the feature that actually differentiates KnowBe4 from a decade-old library of training videos, ships only on the Diamond tier. Buyers who purchase Silver or Gold to save money get the same campaign-based admin workflow KnowBe4 has run since 2015, not the AI-native product the 2026 marketing leads with. If your budget caps out below Diamond, you're better off comparing Huntress Managed SAT (cheaper, fully managed, no tier-gating) or Hoxhunt (gamification and adaptive difficulty included at any contract size) rather than buying KnowBe4 expecting AI personalization you haven't paid for.

AIDA and Agentic Automation

KnowBe4's AIDA suite grew from a SmartRisk Engine analyzing 316 risk indicators in 2024 to 9 production agents in 2025, with 12 planned for 2026 including an Orchestration Agent that autonomously plans, launches, and manages phishing simulations and training at the individual level. It decides in real time whether a failed phishing test warrants a quick SecurityTip or full remedial training, which is a genuine reduction in manual campaign administration compared to the calendar-based model most of the category still runs on. The caveat is availability: this is Diamond-tier functionality, not a baseline feature.

Tiering and What You Actually Get

Silver, Gold, and Platinum tiers include unlimited phishing tests, the automated security awareness program, and the Virtual Risk Officer risk dashboard. Diamond adds Training Content Level III and AIDA's AI tools, letting administrators personalize phishing difficulty based on an individual's knowledge history. Before buying, map which tier includes the specific capability that sold you on KnowBe4, since the sales demo often runs on Diamond-tier functionality.

Per-user annual subscription across four tiers, roughly $1.30 to $2.35/user/month at volume (Silver to Diamond). AIDA's AI-native features are Diamond-tier only. Contact sales for an exact quote.

Visit KnowBe4
2

Hoxhunt

Runner Up

Best for: Measurable behavior change via gamified, adaptive-difficulty phishing simulation for security-mature teams

Hoxhunt is the strongest pick for organizations past the compliance-checkbox stage and focused on actually lowering click rates and raising real threat-reporting behavior. Its gamified, adaptive-difficulty approach to phishing simulation consistently produces higher engagement and reporting rates than calendar-based programs. It isn't the cheapest or the easiest platform to buy off a price sheet, and its content library is narrower than KnowBe4's or Proofpoint's, but for measurable behavior change, it's the best fit in the category.

Pros

  • Gamification (leaderboards, badges, quests) drives vendor-reported engagement above 90%, well above typical compliance-training completion rates
  • Adaptive difficulty personalizes each employee's phishing simulation based on their actual performance history, not a fixed campaign calendar
  • Consolidates phishing simulation, training, and threat-reporting response automation into one system instead of stitched-together point tools
  • Recognized in Gartner's 2024 Customers' Choice for Security Awareness, and holds a 4.8/5 rating across roughly 3,685 G2 reviews as of mid-2026

Cons

  • Pricing is entirely custom and quote-only, with reported starting contracts around $10,000/year and no published self-serve tiers for small teams
  • Formal compliance-content catalog (industry- and regulation-specific modules) is thinner than KnowBe4's or Proofpoint's library
  • Smaller company footprint than KnowBe4 or Proofpoint means a narrower third-party integration surface
Honest Weakness: Hoxhunt's gamification-first model produces measurably better engagement and reporting behavior than campaign-based training, which is exactly why it's the strongest pick for organizations that already ran a KnowBe4 or Proofpoint program for a year or two and plateaued on click rates. It is not the strongest pick for a first-time buyer whose primary goal is checking a specific regulatory box, since the content catalog covering industry-mapped modules (HIPAA-specific attestation content, PCI-DSS-mapped training) is narrower than the two market leaders. Buyers who need broad regulation-mapped content depth before behavior-change metrics should start with KnowBe4 or Proofpoint ZenGuide instead.

Gamification and Adaptive Difficulty

Hoxhunt personalizes phishing simulation difficulty per employee based on department, location, and prior performance rather than running everyone through the same monthly campaign. Vendor-reported outcomes include 20x lower failure rates and 75%+ detect rates versus baseline compliance training, alongside 90%+ engagement. Treat vendor-reported figures as directional rather than audited, but the underlying mechanism, adaptive difficulty tied to individual performance rather than a fixed calendar, is a real architectural difference from KnowBe4's and Proofpoint's campaign models.

Human Sensor Network

Hoxhunt frames trained employees as a distributed detection layer: the platform's threat-reporting button feeds suspected phishing straight into an incident-response workflow, and Hoxhunt's team can help triage what comes in. For security teams that want employees actively reporting real suspicious email, not just passing an annual quiz, this reporting loop is the platform's core value beyond the training content itself.

Custom enterprise pricing, quoted per employee count and simulation volume. Reported entry contracts start around $10,000/year.

Visit Hoxhunt
3

Proofpoint ZenGuide

Best for Enterprise

Best for: Enterprises already running Proofpoint email security who want unified human-risk scoring across email and training

ZenGuide is Proofpoint's rebuild of its Security Awareness Training product, rebranded in 2024 around AI-driven personalization and risk-informed targeting. It earns its place for one specific buyer: organizations already running Proofpoint email security who want training decisions driven by the same risk signal that protects their inbox. Outside that stack, it's an above-average but not category-leading training product at enterprise pricing.

Pros

  • Rebuilt around AI-driven personalization: training is automatically assigned and sequenced by role, behavior, and risk score instead of static campaigns
  • Deep integration with Proofpoint's Nexus People Risk Explorer pulls real click, report, and risk data from Proofpoint's email security stack directly into training targeting
  • Multi-language content with WCAG accessibility support, useful for large global workforces
  • Benchmark reporting against industry peers supports board-level risk reporting

Cons

  • Full differentiation, risk-informed targeting, depends on also running Proofpoint's email security products; ZenGuide alone is a materially weaker product than ZenGuide plus Proofpoint email
  • Pricing is quote-only with no published self-serve tiers; industry estimates put full deployments on the higher end of the category
  • Far fewer independent reviews and less standalone market mindshare than KnowBe4
Honest Weakness: ZenGuide's risk-informed targeting is genuinely differentiated when it's fed live signal from Proofpoint's email security and Nexus People Risk Explorer, since it can prioritize training for the specific employees whose real click and report behavior shows elevated risk. Buy it without the rest of the Proofpoint stack and you're paying enterprise pricing for a training product that has lost its main advantage over KnowBe4 or Hoxhunt. It's the right choice specifically for organizations already standardized on Proofpoint email security who want one vendor and one risk score. It is not the right choice for a security-awareness-only buyer shopping on price or content breadth alone.

From Security Awareness Training to ZenGuide

Proofpoint rebranded its Security Awareness Training product to ZenGuide in 2024 as part of a broader human-centric security push, adding automated risk-based training assignment, AI-driven phishing simulations built from real intercepted attack patterns, and behavior-change measurement rather than course-completion tracking. The rebrand tracks a real product shift, not just a new name on the same tool: assignment logic moved from admin-built campaigns to automated, risk-score-driven sequencing.

Nexus People Risk Explorer Integration

Nexus People Risk Explorer aggregates risk data across Proofpoint's product line to build a people-centric risk view, flagging users who click risky links, use risky third-party apps, or otherwise show elevated behavioral risk, and recommends adaptive controls per user or department. ZenGuide consumes this same risk data to decide who gets retrained and how urgently, which is the specific mechanism that makes ZenGuide more than a standalone training library for existing Proofpoint customers.

Custom enterprise pricing, quote-only. Industry estimates put deployments in the range of roughly $18+/user/month for full-featured tiers; confirm current numbers with Proofpoint sales.

Visit Proofpoint ZenGuide
4

Mimecast Engage

Honorable Mention

Best for: Mimecast email security customers wanting a lower-cost, bundled human-risk training add-on

Mimecast Engage is a credible, behaviorally grounded human-risk platform built on real acquisition DNA (Elevate Security, acquired January 2024), and its short monthly cadence is a legitimate answer to training fatigue. It's an honorable mention rather than a top pick because its clearest value, real click-data risk scoring, is tied to also running Mimecast email security, and its comedy-first content style won't fit every workplace culture.

Pros

  • Built on the Elevate Security acquisition, giving Mimecast Engage real behavioral risk-scoring roots rather than a bolted-on training module
  • Short, 3-5 minute monthly-cadence video content reduces the annual-training-slog complaint common with legacy compliance courses
  • Engage Core and Engage Pro tiers let existing Mimecast email security customers add training as a lower-cost bundle rather than a full separate purchase
  • Real click-data integration from Mimecast email security elevates user risk scores using actual behavior, not just simulated-phishing results

Cons

  • The comedic, mini-sitcom video format is a specific creative bet that doesn't fit every corporate culture, particularly regulated industries and government
  • Like Proofpoint, the strongest signal-driven targeting depends on also running Mimecast email security; standalone value is thinner
  • Shorter independent track record than KnowBe4 or Proofpoint, since Engage is a 2024-era rebuild rather than a decade-mature product
Honest Weakness: Mimecast Engage's humor-driven video format, professionally scripted comedy shorts produced with entertainment-industry writers, tests well for engagement in casual, tech-forward workplace cultures, but it's a real gamble in regulated or formal environments. Healthcare compliance teams and government agencies in particular have flagged that the comedic tone can undercut how seriously employees take the material. If your culture leans formal, or your compliance team needs to defend content tone in an audit, watch the actual video samples before buying rather than trusting the pitch. Organizations already on Mimecast email security who want a lower-cost bundled add-on are the clearest fit.

From Elevate Security to Engage

Mimecast acquired Elevate Security in January 2024, folded its behavioral risk-scoring engine into a new Human Risk Management Platform, and later reimagined the training product into Engage Core and Engage Pro tiers. The acquisition lineage matters: Engage's risk scoring isn't a marketing layer bolted onto generic training content, it inherited an actual behavioral-analytics product built specifically to score human risk.

Content Style and Risk Scoring

Engage's training modules run as short, comedy-scripted videos (3-5 minutes, delivered roughly monthly) rather than long annual compliance courses, aiming to reduce the fatigue that drives employees to click through training without absorbing it. Layered on top, Engage pulls real click and report data from Mimecast's email security product to elevate user risk scores with actual behavior rather than simulated-phishing results alone, when the customer runs both products together.

Custom pricing via Engage Core and Engage Pro tiers, quote-only, typically bundled with a Mimecast email security subscription.

Visit Mimecast Engage
5

Huntress Managed SAT

Best Value

Best for: SMBs and MSPs that need training running now with zero dedicated admin time

Formerly Curricula until Huntress acquired it for $22 million in 2022, Huntress Managed SAT is the best-value pick for SMBs and MSPs specifically: sub-10-minute setup, transparent per-learner pricing, and a fully managed content cadence that needs zero admin hours to run. It isn't built to compete with KnowBe4 or Proofpoint on enterprise compliance depth, and it isn't trying to.

Pros

  • Fastest deployment in the category: sub-10-minute tenant setup with directory sync for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Okta, versus multi-week rollouts elsewhere
  • Fully managed program, Huntress curates and schedules the content, removes the admin overhead that's the top complaint about DIY platforms at their lower tiers
  • Transparent, volume-tiered per-learner pricing billed only for active users, with no published hidden fees
  • Backed by Huntress's own threat intelligence from 5M+ protected endpoints and 14M+ identities, feeding real current attack patterns into simulation content
  • Natural bundle for existing Huntress EDR, ITDR, or SIEM customers and for MSPs managing many small clients from one console

Cons

  • Narrative-driven content (a recurring character, a fictional town setting) is lighter-weight than enterprise compliance libraries and thinner on industry-specific regulatory modules
  • The managed-for-you model gives admins less granular campaign customization than KnowBe4 or Proofpoint expose to teams that want to build their own campaigns
  • Built for SMB and MSP delivery; large enterprises with a dedicated security-awareness team and complex multi-business-unit reporting will outgrow it faster
Honest Weakness: Huntress Managed SAT's whole pitch is removing admin burden: Huntress schedules, curates, and manages the program so nobody has to build campaigns by hand. That's the right trade for the SMB and MSP audience it's built for, where there's usually no dedicated security-awareness role to begin with. It's the wrong trade for a large enterprise security team that wants to assign industry-specific content, build custom reporting per business unit, or granularly control simulation cadence, KnowBe4 and Proofpoint ZenGuide both expose far more admin-facing configuration. If you have a named security-awareness program owner and complex compliance-reporting needs, look at the two market leaders instead.

From Curricula to Huntress Managed SAT

Huntress acquired Curricula, an Atlanta-based security awareness training startup, for $22 million in July 2022 and rebuilt it as Huntress Managed SAT. The product kept Curricula's narrative-driven approach, story-style episodes built around a recurring character and setting, while adding threat intelligence sourced from Huntress's own base of 5M+ protected endpoints and 14M+ managed identities into the simulation content.

Built for MSPs and Lean IT Teams

Multi-tenant support lets MSPs run awareness training across many small clients from a single console, and a la carte pricing lets both direct customers and MSPs add Managed SAT without committing to Huntress's full EDR/ITDR/SIEM suite. Combined with sub-10-minute tenant setup and automated program scheduling, it's built specifically for organizations without a dedicated person to run a training program, which is most companies under a few hundred employees.

Per-learner, per-month subscription billed annually, volume-tiered starting around 50 learners, billed only for active users. Contact sales for exact per-seat rate.

Visit Huntress Managed SAT

Which One Should You Pick?

Use CaseOur Recommendation
A 3-person IT team at a 200-person company needs training running this week with zero ongoing admin time.Huntress Managed SAT. Sub-10-minute setup and a fully managed content cadence mean nobody has to build or run campaigns by hand.
We've run KnowBe4 (or a similar compliance-style program) for two years and click rates have plateaued.Hoxhunt. Gamified, adaptive-difficulty simulation is built specifically to push behavior change past what calendar-based training achieves.
We're a Proofpoint email security customer and want one vendor's risk score spanning email and training.Proofpoint ZenGuide. Its Nexus People Risk Explorer integration only pays off when you're already running Proofpoint's email stack.
We need the deepest compliance content library, covering HIPAA, PCI, and GDPR-mapped modules by industry, as a single default choice.KnowBe4. No competitor matches its content library breadth, and the Diamond tier adds AI-driven personalization on top.
We're already a Mimecast email security customer and want to add training without a new vendor or a big new procurement cycle.Mimecast Engage. Engage Core bundles into an existing Mimecast subscription at lower incremental cost than a standalone platform.

How we evaluated

Security awareness training gets sold on engagement metrics and feature lists, but the decision that actually matters is whether a program lowers click rates and raises reporting behavior without eating a team's admin time. This comparison weighs the trade-offs buyers hit in production, not vendor-reported engagement claims taken at face value.

Each platform was assessed on the criteria that decide real outcomes, the same dimensions you see in the comparison table above:

  • Best fit: the buyer profile each platform genuinely serves, from SMBs with no dedicated training admin to large enterprises already standardized on a specific email security stack.
  • Behavior-change evidence: whether the vendor publishes real click-rate, reporting-rate, or engagement data tied to a specific mechanism (adaptive difficulty, risk-based targeting), versus generic claims about "engaging content."
  • Admin overhead: how much staff time it takes to run a program week to week, fully managed versus campaign-built versus somewhere in between.
  • Content depth versus behavior focus: breadth of regulation-mapped compliance modules against depth of gamification and adaptive-difficulty mechanics built for measurable behavior change.
  • Pricing model: how cost scales with seats, and whether the differentiating capability is included at every tier or gated to the top one.

What we reviewed

This comparison draws on vendor documentation and publicly posted pricing, third-party review data from G2, Gartner Peer Insights, and TrustRadius, and the current threat landscape that defines the category. It reflects the market as of August 2026, including Proofpoint's 2024 rebrand to ZenGuide and Huntress's 2022 acquisition of Curricula, and is refreshed as vendors ship and reprice.

Note

Editorial independence: this is a vendor-neutral comparison with no paid placements, sponsorships, or affiliate links. Rankings reflect fit for the stated use cases, not commercial relationships.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best security awareness training platform in 2026?
There isn't a single best platform, the right pick depends on what you're solving for. KnowBe4 is the safest default for most buyers because of its content library depth and AI-driven AIDA suite, though AIDA is Diamond-tier only. Hoxhunt is the stronger pick if you've already run a compliance-style program and need to actually move click rates and reporting behavior. Proofpoint ZenGuide and Mimecast Engage make sense specifically if you already run those vendors' email security. Huntress Managed SAT is the best fit for SMBs and MSPs with no dedicated training admin.
Is KnowBe4 worth the price?
It depends heavily on which tier you buy. Silver, Gold, and Platinum get the full content library, unlimited phishing tests, and the Virtual Risk Officer risk dashboard, all genuinely useful. The AI-driven AIDA suite that KnowBe4's 2026 marketing leads with, autonomous simulation planning and individualized personalization, is Diamond-tier only. If AI personalization is why you're buying KnowBe4, confirm your quote includes Diamond before signing.
What happened to Curricula security awareness training?
Huntress acquired Curricula for $22 million in July 2022. The product is now sold as Huntress Managed SAT, keeping Curricula's story-driven training format while adding Huntress's own threat intelligence (from 5M+ protected endpoints and 14M+ identities) into the simulation content. Curricula as a standalone brand no longer exists.
Is Proofpoint Security Awareness Training the same product as ZenGuide?
Yes. Proofpoint rebranded Security Awareness Training to ZenGuide in 2024 as part of a broader human-centric security push, alongside a real product shift toward automated, risk-score-driven training assignment fed by Proofpoint's Nexus People Risk Explorer. If you see either name in a vendor comparison, they refer to the same current product.
How much does security awareness training cost per employee?
Published numbers are inconsistent because most vendors quote custom pricing, but rough ranges across this category run from about $1 to $2.50 per user per month at the lower end (KnowBe4's Silver through Platinum tiers, Huntress Managed SAT) up to $18+ per user per month for full enterprise deployments with risk-signal integration (Proofpoint ZenGuide). Hoxhunt and Mimecast Engage are both quote-only with no published per-seat rate; expect Hoxhunt contracts to start around $10,000/year regardless of headcount tier.
Do I actually need a dedicated platform, or can I just run phishing tests myself?
Homegrown phishing tests (an admin manually sending fake emails) catch far less than a real platform because they lack adaptive difficulty, automated remediation assignment, reporting infrastructure, and legally defensible audit trails for compliance frameworks like HIPAA or PCI DSS. The exception is very small teams (under 20-30 people) where a dedicated platform's fixed costs may not be worth it yet. Once you need to report training completion to an auditor or a cyber-insurance underwriter, a real platform earns its cost quickly.

About the author

is the founder and creator of LoginRadius, a customer identity platform he built and scaled to over a billion users. He is now the founder of GrackerAI, a GEO platform for B2B SaaS and cybersecurity teams, and has spent more than 15 years building identity and security products.

Related Comparisons