Skip to content
Cybersecurity · Passwordless & MFA

Top 5 Passwordless and MFA Platforms: Yubico, HYPR, MojoAuth, Transmit Security, and Duo Compared

Enterprise passwordless and phishing-resistant MFA platforms compared for workforce and customer identity.

By Deepak Gupta·Jun 10, 2026·15 min·5 tools compared
PasswordlessMFAPasskeysFIDO2Cybersecurity

Quick Comparison

ToolBest ForPhishing-ResistantForm FactorDeploymentPricing
Yubico (YubiKey + YubiEnterprise)Highest-assurance hardware AAL3Yes -- hardware FIDO2 (strongest)Hardware security keyHardware + subscription deliveryKeys ~$29-$98; YubiEnterprise quote-based
HYPRFast software passwordless for the workforceYes -- non-syncable enterprise passkeysPhone-as-authenticator + desktopLightweight, days not quarters$3 / $6 / $9 per user/mo
MojoAuthDevelopers adding passwordless to apps (CIAM)Partial -- passkeys yes; OTP/magic-link noSoftware API (passkeys, OTP, magic links)API/SDK, hosted pagesFree to 25k MAU; from $50/mo; Enterprise custom
Transmit Security (Mosaic)Unified customer + workforce identity with fraudConfigurable -- passkeys among many methodsSoftware platform (orchestration)Platform-scale, no-code orchestrationConsumption-based, quote-only
Cisco DuoBroad, easy MFA with a passwordless pathConfigurable -- FIDO2 if enforcedSoftware MFA + supports FIDO2 keysFast, huge integration catalogFree (10 users); $3 / $6 / $9 per user/mo
1

Yubico (YubiKey + YubiEnterprise Subscription)

Best Overall

Best for: Highest-assurance hardware authentication at scale

Yubico is the gold standard for phishing-resistant authentication. The YubiKey is a multi-protocol hardware security key trusted by governments and large enterprises, and the YubiEnterprise Subscription wraps procurement, delivery, and lifecycle management around it. If your threat model demands hardware-rooted AAL3, nothing else on this list matches it.

Pros

  • Hardware-rooted, phishing-resistant credentials that resist remote attacks with no shared secrets and no push fatigue; the only authenticator authorized by the U.S. DoD to hold both DoD PKI credentials and FIDO2 passkeys
  • Multi-protocol in one device: FIDO2, WebAuthn, passkeys, Smart Card (PIV/CAC), OpenPGP, OATH-TOTP/HOTP, and Yubico OTP, working across nearly every IdP and legacy system
  • FIPS 140-3 validated models (YubiKey 5 FIPS Series) plus Enterprise Attestation and FIDO Pre-registration for asset tracking and streamlined enrollment

Cons

  • Per-device hardware cost and physical logistics (distribution, lost-key replacement, backup keys) add operational overhead that software-only options avoid
  • The YubiKey is a credential carrier, not an IAM platform, so you still need an IdP such as Entra, Okta, or Duo to broker authentication and policy
Honest Weakness: Yubico solves the credential layer brilliantly but leaves the orchestration, risk scoring, and account-recovery layers to your IdP. Every user needs at least one key, ideally two for backup, so cost and the help-desk burden of lost or forgotten keys scale linearly with headcount in a way software passkeys do not. Issuance, shipping, and replacement at a globally distributed workforce is a real program to run, even with YubiEnterprise Delivery handling logistics. And because it is hardware, the rollout pace is gated by physical fulfillment, not just software config.

Phishing-Resistant Authentication (FIDO2/WebAuthn/Passkeys)

The YubiKey generates and stores FIDO2 credentials in tamper-resistant hardware, so the private key never leaves the device and cannot be phished, replayed, or remotely exfiltrated. Authentication is cryptographically bound to the legitimate origin, defeating real-time phishing proxies and man-in-the-middle kits that defeat OTP and push MFA. Because the key requires physical presence (a touch) and is not syncable across devices, it delivers device-bound, non-syncable passkeys, the strongest form of FIDO2 assurance. This is the category most resistant to the account-takeover and ransomware-precursor attacks that dominate recent breach reports.

Standards and Certifications (FIDO2, NIST AAL3, FIPS)

YubiKeys are FIDO2 and FIDO U2F certified and support the full WebAuthn stack. The YubiKey 5 FIPS Series is FIPS 140-3 validated and enables compliance with NIST SP 800-63B Authenticator Assurance Level 3 (AAL3), the highest assurance level, which effectively requires a hardware authenticator with verifier-impersonation resistance. For regulated sectors such as federal, defense, finance, and healthcare, this combination of FIPS validation plus AAL3 capability is the differentiator that software-only passkeys cannot meet today.

Deployment and Workforce Rollout

YubiEnterprise Subscription bundles the keys with YubiEnterprise Delivery (turnkey global shipping to end users) and the YubiEnterprise Console for fleet management, so large organizations can roll out without building their own fulfillment pipeline. FIDO Pre-registration lets IT pre-enroll keys to user accounts before shipping, cutting first-login friction, and Enterprise Attestation reads the laser-marked serial number during FIDO2 registration for asset tracking. The trade-off versus software approaches is that rollout speed is bounded by physical distribution and the need to provision backup keys.

Keys ~$29-$98 each / YubiEnterprise Subscription quote-based (500+ users; updated Jan 2026)

Visit Yubico (YubiKey + YubiEnterprise Subscription)
2

HYPR

Runner Up

Best for: Fast software passwordless across the workforce

HYPR delivers FIDO-certified, phishing-resistant passwordless across web, desktop, and remote access with a deployment measured in days rather than quarters. In 2025 it shipped what it bills as the first true non-syncable enterprise FIDO2 passkey for Microsoft Entra ID via the Entra FIDO2 provisioning APIs. It pairs authentication with identity-verification and risk orchestration, making it a strong end-to-end identity-assurance choice short of issuing hardware to everyone.

Pros

  • True passwordless from the first login: the smartphone becomes a FIDO2 authenticator, eliminating shared secrets across web SSO, desktop MFA, VPN, VDI, and remote access
  • Non-syncable, device-bound enterprise passkeys for Entra ID, a meaningful security upgrade over consumer syncable passkeys, built on Microsoft's FIDO2 provisioning APIs
  • Bundles identity verification and adaptive risk orchestration for phishing-resistant onboarding and account recovery, closing the recovery gap that undermines many passwordless rollouts

Cons

  • Per-user subscription cost stacks on top of your existing IdP spend, and reaching the full feature set pushes you into the higher tiers
  • The strongest enterprise-passkey story is tightly coupled to Microsoft Entra ID, so value is highest in Microsoft-centric estates
Honest Weakness: HYPR's phone-as-authenticator model is excellent UX but depends on users having a capable, enrolled mobile device, which complicates shared-workstation, call-center, and BYOD-restricted environments where a hardware key is cleaner. It is a focused passwordless and identity-assurance vendor rather than a full IAM and SSO suite, so it layers onto, not replaces, your identity provider, adding a vendor and a cost line. The headline non-syncable Entra passkey capability is newest and most differentiated inside the Microsoft ecosystem, so non-Microsoft shops see comparatively less of the unique upside. As a private company it lacks the brand ubiquity of Yubico or Cisco, which can matter in conservative procurement.

Phishing-Resistant Authentication (FIDO2/WebAuthn/Passkeys)

HYPR is FIDO Certified and turns the user's smartphone into a roaming FIDO2 authenticator, so login uses public-key cryptography bound to the legitimate origin rather than a phishable password or OTP. Its 2025 Enterprise Passkeys for Entra ID are explicitly non-syncable and device-bound, which prevents the credential-export and cross-device-sync risks of consumer passkeys and keeps assurance high. Policy controls add third-party attack mitigation and jailbreak and root detection. The result is phishing-resistant MFA without distributing hardware to every user.

Deployment and Workforce Rollout

HYPR markets a lightweight, fast deployment, rolling phishing-resistant MFA across an entire workforce in days rather than quarters, with prebuilt integrations to Entra ID, Okta, and other IdPs. Coverage spans web SSO, desktop MFA on Windows and Mac, and remote access via VPN and VDI, so a single platform addresses both the browser and the OS-login surfaces. Phishing-resistant onboarding and recovery flows address the weakest link in most passwordless programs: enrollment and account recovery. The HYPR-Microsoft FIDO2 provisioning API integration streamlines large-scale Entra ID passkey issuance.

Authentication Methods and Identity Assurance

Beyond passwordless login, HYPR layers adaptive authentication, real-time risk scoring, device fingerprinting, and identity verification into one identity-assurance platform. This lets organizations step up assurance for high-risk events and verify users during onboarding or recovery, defending against the AI-driven impersonation and help-desk social-engineering attacks prominent today. The combination positions HYPR as more than an authenticator, as an end-to-end workforce identity-assurance layer.

$3 / $6 / $9 per user/mo (Access / Plus / Advanced); CIAM custom

Visit HYPR
3

MojoAuth

Best Value

Best for: Developers adding passwordless to apps via API

MojoAuth is a developer-first passwordless authentication API covering passkeys (FIDO2/WebAuthn), email and phone OTP, magic links, social login, and MFA. Its free tier up to 25,000 MAUs and transparent MAU-based pricing make it the standout value pick, especially for CIAM and SaaS use cases. It is more of an embeddable auth platform than a workforce or desktop-MFA tool, so it serves as the developer and customer-facing complement to the others.

Pros

  • Free tier up to 25,000 MAUs with no credit card, and transparent MAU-based pricing substantially cheaper than Auth0-class CIAM at the same band
  • Broad passwordless coverage in one API: passkeys (FIDO2/WebAuthn), email and phone OTP, magic links, social login, plus MFA, SSO, and custom domains on paid tiers
  • Fast developer integration with hosted login pages, SDKs, and branded templates; the MAU model keeps costs low for apps with large but intermittently active user bases

Cons

  • Oriented to customer and developer (CIAM) use cases, so it does not provide workforce desktop MFA, VPN/VDI login, or hardware-key lifecycle management
  • Public FIPS 140-3 and NIST AAL3 attestation is not part of its positioning, so it is not the pick for AAL3-mandated regulated workforce scenarios
Honest Weakness: MojoAuth is an excellent embeddable passwordless API, but it solves a different problem than the workforce-MFA vendors here: it secures your application's end users, not your employees logging into Windows, VPN, or SaaS via SSO. Phishing resistance depends on which method you enable, since passkeys are phishing-resistant but email and SMS OTP and magic links are not, so assurance is a configuration choice rather than a guarantee. It does not issue or manage hardware keys and does not market itself against NIST AAL3, so high-assurance regulated workforce deployments will look elsewhere. As a smaller, developer-focused vendor it carries less enterprise brand recognition than Cisco or Yubico in conservative procurement.

Developer Integration / API

MojoAuth is built API-first: drop-in SDKs, hosted login pages, and a single API surface for OTP, magic links, passkeys, social login, and SSO let teams ship passwordless in hours rather than building WebAuthn ceremonies and OTP delivery from scratch. Branded email templates and custom domains keep the experience white-labeled. The MAU billing model means you pay for active users, not your entire registered base, which is a large total-cost win for consumer and SaaS apps. This developer-ergonomics focus is why it slots in as the value and CIAM complement rather than a workforce desktop tool.

Authentication Methods

The platform spans passkeys (FIDO2/WebAuthn with biometrics and device auth), email and phone OTP, WhatsApp OTP, TOTP, magic links, social login, and step-up MFA. Defaulting users toward passkeys reduces reliance on SMS OTP, which MojoAuth notes can cut SMS costs while raising security. Teams can mix methods per risk level and migrate users from OTP and magic-link toward passkeys over time. Because some methods such as OTP and magic links are not phishing-resistant, achieving phishing-resistant assurance means deliberately prioritizing passkeys.

Deployment and Compliance

MojoAuth is delivered as a cloud API with hosted login pages and SDKs, so integration is largely a front-end and configuration exercise rather than infrastructure work. The Enterprise (Private Cloud) tier adds a dedicated cloud, fraud detection and device fingerprinting, whitelabel APIs, and SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA coverage with stronger uptime and latency SLAs. This makes it suitable for customer-facing apps that need compliance without standing up their own identity infrastructure. It remains a CIAM-oriented platform rather than a workforce access tool.

Free to 25,000 MAUs / Business Pro from $50/mo (~$0.06/MAU overage) / Enterprise custom

Visit MojoAuth
4

Transmit Security (Mosaic)

Best for Enterprise

Best for: Unified customer and workforce identity with fraud

Transmit Security's Mosaic is a unified, microservices-based identity platform spanning passwordless authentication, identity orchestration, user management, identity verification, and fraud detection across B2C, B2B, and workforce. It supports passkeys, OTP, mobile biometrics, magic links, and social login, with drag-and-drop journey design. It is the most comprehensive and heaviest platform here, best when identity, fraud, and orchestration must live together.

Pros

  • A single platform covering authentication, orchestration, user management, identity verification, and fraud and risk, reducing vendor sprawl for large, complex identity programs
  • No-code identity orchestration with drag-and-drop journeys, letting teams design and adapt auth flows without rebuilding integrations
  • Strong on customer-facing fraud prevention and risk signals, with passkeys plus a full range of MFA methods (OTP, biometrics, magic links, social)

Cons

  • Pricing is consumption-based and quote-only with no public per-user list, making cost hard to estimate and budget without a sales engagement
  • Heavier, platform-scale adoption, more than most mid-market teams need if they only want phishing-resistant workforce login; public FIDO2 and AAL3 certification detail is thin in its marketing
Honest Weakness: Transmit and Mosaic are powerful but represent a platform commitment, not a quick add-on, so realizing the value requires investment in orchestration design and integration that smaller teams may find disproportionate. Its center of gravity is customer identity and fraud prevention; the workforce-passwordless story exists but is less of a headline than vendors like HYPR or Yubico that lead with it. Consumption-based pricing with no published rates makes total cost opaque and harder to compare line-for-line against per-user competitors. And because passkeys are one method among many it offers, phishing-resistant assurance depends on how you configure journeys rather than being the default posture.

Phishing-Resistant Authentication (FIDO2/WebAuthn/Passkeys)

Transmit's FIDO2 implementation combines CTAP and WebAuthn to deliver passkey-based, passwordless login using built-in device biometrics, removing passwords and OTPs from the flow. Passkeys are offered alongside OTP, mobile biometrics, magic links, and social login, so organizations choose the assurance level per journey. The platform has publicized passkey-adoption work with Microsoft for CIAM. Because passkeys are one option among several, phishing resistance is realized by prioritizing passkeys within orchestrated flows rather than being enforced by default.

Deployment and Orchestration

Mosaic is a microservices CIAM-plus-workforce platform with no-code, drag-and-drop identity orchestration, letting teams compose onboarding, authentication, verification, and recovery journeys visually. User management, authentication, identity verification, and fraud detection are unified core services, so signals flow between them, for example risk-based step-up. This breadth suits large enterprises consolidating customer and workforce identity onto one stack. The trade-off is that this is a strategic platform adoption with a learning curve, not a drop-in authenticator.

Authentication Methods and Fraud

The platform supports the full MFA range -- passkeys, OTP, mobile biometrics, magic links, and social login -- combined with continuous fraud detection and risk scoring. This pairing of authentication with fraud and risk is its distinguishing strength, particularly for high-volume consumer scenarios and emerging AI-agent threats. For workforce use, the same orchestration and risk engine can gate access to sensitive systems, ensuring only verified users authenticate.

Consumption-based, quote-only (no public per-user or per-MAU rates)

Visit Transmit Security (Mosaic)
5

Cisco Duo

Honorable Mention

Best for: Broad, easy MFA with a path to passwordless

Cisco Duo is the most widely deployed, easiest-to-adopt MFA platform here, with transparent per-user tiers and strong device-trust and adaptive-access features. It supports passwordless via FIDO2/WebAuthn platform authenticators and roaming security keys such as YubiKey, plus Verified Duo Push to fight push fatigue. It is the pragmatic, broad-coverage choice, though its default push and OTP methods are less phishing-resistant than FIDO2-first vendors unless you enforce passwordless.

Pros

  • Fast, broad deployment and a huge integration ecosystem; transparent per-user pricing and a free tier for pilots make adoption low-friction
  • Supports phishing-resistant passwordless via FIDO2/WebAuthn, both platform authenticators (passkeys and device biometrics) and roaming security keys like YubiKey and Feitian
  • Strong adaptive access, device-health and trust checks, and VPN-less remote access in higher tiers, plus Verified Duo Push to counter MFA push fatigue

Cons

  • Its default and most common methods (Duo Push and OTP) are not phishing-resistant; achieving phishing resistance requires deliberately enforcing FIDO2 and passwordless policies
  • The most valuable capabilities (device trust, VPN-less access) sit in the higher Advantage and Premier tiers, raising the effective per-user cost
Honest Weakness: Duo's strength -- meeting users wherever they are with push, OTP, and biometrics -- is also its phishing-resistance caveat: out of the box many deployments lean on push and OTP, which modern phishing proxies and push-fatigue attacks can defeat, so true phishing resistance depends on enforcing FIDO2 and passwordless policy. As an MFA and access-policy layer it relies on FIDO2 hardware (often YubiKeys) or platform passkeys for AAL3-grade assurance, meaning Duo is the broker rather than the credential of record. Feature gating pushes device-trust and VPN-less access into the pricier Advantage and Premier tiers. It is excellent breadth-first MFA, but a FIDO2-first vendor delivers higher baseline assurance without configuration effort.

Phishing-Resistant Authentication (FIDO2/WebAuthn/Passkeys)

Duo Passwordless supports FIDO2/WebAuthn using platform authenticators (passkeys via device biometrics) and roaming authenticators (FIDO2 security keys from Yubico, Feitian, and others), which are phishing-resistant because credentials are origin-bound and passwords are removed from the flow. As of mid-2025, new policies enable all passwordless methods by default. For deployments still on Duo Push, Verified Duo Push requires entering a code from the access device to defeat push-harassment and fatigue attacks. To reach genuine phishing resistance, administrators should enforce FIDO2 and passwordless rather than allowing fallback to push or OTP.

Deployment and Workforce Rollout

Duo's hallmark is ease and breadth: a large catalog of prebuilt integrations across SaaS, VPNs, RDP, and cloud apps lets organizations roll out MFA quickly across a heterogeneous estate. Self-service enrollment and Duo Mobile keep onboarding light, and per-user tiers scale cleanly. Higher tiers add adaptive access policies, device-health checks, and VPN-less remote access via Duo Network Gateway for a zero-trust posture. This makes Duo the pragmatic choice when coverage breadth and speed matter more than enforcing hardware-grade assurance on day one.

Authentication Methods and Device Trust

Duo spans Duo Push (with Verified Push), OTP and passcodes, FIDO2 security keys, platform passkeys and biometrics, and SMS and phone fallback, letting admins tune methods per risk. Advantage and Premier add adaptive access, device-health and trust checks, and threat detection so policy can require stronger auth for risky context. Pairing Duo with YubiKeys is a common pattern to get both Duo's policy and orchestration and Yubico's AAL3-grade hardware credential. The flexibility is a strength for mixed environments but means assurance is a policy decision, not a default.

Free (10 users) / Essentials $3 / Advantage $6 / Premier $9 per user/mo

Visit Cisco Duo

Which One Should You Pick?

Use CaseOur Recommendation
Federal, defense, or other NIST AAL3-mandated workforceYubico YubiKey 5 FIPS (FIPS 140-3, AAL3-capable), brokered through an IdP such as Cisco Duo or Entra. Nothing software-only meets AAL3 today.
Microsoft Entra ID enterprise wanting fast, software phishing-resistant passwordless for all employeesHYPR, with non-syncable enterprise passkeys for Entra ID plus desktop, VPN, and VDI coverage, deployable in days.
SaaS or consumer product team adding passwordless login to its own app on a budgetMojoAuth, with passkeys, OTP, and magic links via API, free to 25,000 MAUs and transparent MAU pricing.
Large enterprise consolidating customer and workforce identity with integrated fraud detectionTransmit Security Mosaic, with unified authentication, orchestration, verification, and fraud across B2C, B2B, and workforce.
Organization needing broad, easy MFA across a heterogeneous app and VPN estate with a path to passwordlessCisco Duo for the fastest broad rollout and adaptive access; enforce FIDO2 and passwordless, optionally with YubiKeys, for phishing resistance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between passwordless authentication and MFA?
MFA (multi-factor authentication) means requiring two or more factors -- something you know, have, or are -- and traditionally keeps the password as one factor plus an OTP or push. Passwordless authentication removes the password entirely, replacing it with a possession factor such as a passkey, security key, or phone, combined with a biometric or PIN. The two overlap: modern passwordless using FIDO2 is itself a form of strong MFA, because the device (possession) plus biometric or PIN (inherence or knowledge) satisfies multiple factors without a shared secret. The key win is eliminating the password, the single most attacked and phishable credential. Note that not all MFA is phishing-resistant and not all passwordless is equally strong, so the method matters.
What makes MFA phishing-resistant, and how do FIDO2 and passkeys fit in?
Phishing-resistant MFA cannot be defeated by tricking a user into handing over a code on a fake site or approving a fraudulent push, because the credential is cryptographically bound to the legitimate website's origin. FIDO2 (WebAuthn plus CTAP) achieves this with public-key cryptography: the private key never leaves the device and only signs challenges from the registered origin, so a phishing proxy gets nothing usable. Passkeys are FIDO2 credentials, and they can live on a security key (device-bound) or sync across a platform account (syncable). Hardware keys and non-syncable enterprise passkeys offer the highest assurance, while OTP and standard push MFA are not phishing-resistant. CISA and NIST both now urge organizations to move to phishing-resistant MFA.
Hardware security keys versus software passkeys -- which should we use?
Hardware keys such as YubiKeys store credentials in tamper-resistant silicon, are non-syncable and device-bound, and are the only option that meets NIST AAL3 with FIPS validation, ideal for high-assurance, regulated, or shared-workstation use, at the cost of per-device price and physical logistics. Software and platform passkeys (Face ID, Windows Hello, or phone-based) are cheaper, friction-light, and great for broad rollout, but consumer passkeys can sync across a cloud account, which lowers assurance for enterprise threat models. Enterprise vendors like HYPR address this with non-syncable, device-bound passkeys that keep assurance high without issuing hardware to everyone. Many organizations blend both: hardware keys for admins and high-risk roles, software passkeys for the general workforce.
Why are passwords dying, and what is NIST AAL3?
Passwords are dying because they are the root cause of the majority of breaches: reused, phishable, guessable, and harvestable at scale by credential-stuffing and AI-assisted phishing kits that defeat OTP and push MFA. Phishing-resistant passwordless removes the shared secret entirely, so there is nothing for an attacker to steal or replay. NIST AAL3 (Authenticator Assurance Level 3, from SP 800-63B) is the highest assurance tier and effectively requires a hardware-based authenticator with verifier-impersonation resistance and proof of possession of a cryptographic key, in practice a FIDO2 hardware security key or smart card, often FIPS 140-validated. For workforce identity this matters as a compliance line: AAL2 can be met by good software passkeys, but AAL3 today means hardware. As a related distinction, workforce passwordless secures employees logging into corporate systems, while customer and CIAM passwordless (MojoAuth, Transmit) secures your application's end users, with different rollout, recovery, and scale concerns even when the underlying FIDO2 technology is the same.

Related Comparisons