Skip to content
Cybersecurity · CIEM

Top 5 CIEM Tools: Wiz, Orca, Tenable Cloud Security, Sonrai, and Britive Compared

Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management platforms compared for least-privilege across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

By Deepak Gupta·Jun 10, 2026·15 min·5 tools compared
CIEMCloud SecurityIdentity SecurityLeast PrivilegeCybersecurity

Quick Comparison

ToolBest ForCloud CoverageStandalone vs CNAPPDeploymentPricing
WizGraph-based CIEM with attack-path prioritizationAWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, K8s, SaaS/dataCNAPP-bundled (no standalone CIEM)AgentlessCustom; resource-based
Orca SecurityAgentless CIEM inside a unified CNAPPAWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Alibaba, K8sCNAPP-bundledAgentless (SideScanning)Custom; per-workload
Tenable Cloud Security (ex-Ermetic)Identity-first enterprise CIEM plus JITAWS, Azure, GCPCNAPP-bundled (Tenable One)AgentlessCustom; no standalone Ermetic SKU
Sonrai SecurityActive least-privilege enforcementAWS, Azure, Google CloudStandalone identity/CIEM plus cloud PAMAgentless, org-level native policiesCustom (also AWS Marketplace)
BritiveDedicated JIT and zero standing privilegesAWS, Azure, GCP, OCIStandalone dedicated CIEM/cloud PAMAgentless, proxy-less, API-firstCustom
1

Wiz

Best Overall

Best for: Graph-based CIEM with attack-path prioritization

Wiz delivers agentless CIEM as part of its broader cloud security graph, correlating identities, permissions, vulnerabilities, network exposure, and data sensitivity into prioritized attack paths. For most multi-cloud organizations it is the strongest overall option because identity risk is shown in context rather than as an isolated list of over-privileged roles. The trade-off is that you are buying a platform, not a focused CIEM point tool.

Pros

  • The Security Graph correlates entitlements with vulnerabilities, exposure, and data to surface genuine identity attack paths
  • Broad connector coverage: AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Kubernetes, plus SaaS and data platforms like Snowflake, Databricks, GitHub, and GitLab
  • Dedicated non-human-identity dashboard and auto-generated least-privilege policies with guided remediation

Cons

  • CIEM is only sold inside the platform; there is no standalone CIEM SKU
  • Platform-level pricing makes it expensive for teams that want entitlement management alone
Honest Weakness: Wiz is a platform play, so its CIEM strength is also its constraint -- you cannot buy just the entitlement module, and the value depends on adopting the wider Wiz graph. It leans toward visibility, prioritization, and guided remediation rather than enforcement, so it is less of a block-the-permission or just-in-time-provisioning tool than Sonrai or Britive. Organizations wanting active least-privilege enforcement through guardrails or ephemeral access will pair Wiz with another control. Pricing is opaque and scales with cloud resource count, which can surprise large estates.

Multi-Cloud Entitlement Visibility

Coverage spans AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI, plus Kubernetes and major SaaS and data platforms, all collected agentlessly. Wiz normalizes explicit versus effective permissions across these providers so cross-platform access can be reasoned about consistently. A non-human-identity dashboard surfaces risky service accounts, third-party access, and admin-equivalent machine identities. This breadth is one reason Wiz is frequently the default for organizations already standardizing on it for posture and workload protection.

Least-Privilege and Right-Sizing

Wiz analyzes used-versus-granted permissions and auto-generates least-privilege policy recommendations, with access-path visualizations and guided remediation to right-size roles. It highlights inactive admins, unused permissions, and missing MFA. The emphasis is on recommending and guiding fixes inside developer and security workflows rather than automatically enforcing denials.

Identity Risk and Toxic Combinations

Wiz's differentiator is the Security Graph, which joins identities, effective permissions, resources, vulnerabilities, secrets, and network exposure into one model. Instead of flagging an over-privileged service account in isolation, it shows when that account is attached to an internet-exposed workload with an unpatched CVE that can reach crown-jewel data. This lets teams triage the handful of entitlement issues that form real attack paths rather than drowning in thousands of excessive-permission findings. The graph also makes effective-access questions answerable in plain language via the CIEM Explorer.

Custom / contact sales (resource-based; CIEM bundled into the CNAPP)

Visit Wiz
2

Orca Security

Runner Up

Best for: Agentless CIEM inside a unified CNAPP

Orca delivers strong, genuinely agentless CIEM as one pillar of its unified CNAPP, so entitlement risk is automatically correlated with the rest of the cloud-risk picture rather than analyzed in isolation. Its SideScanning approach means broad identity and entitlement visibility with no agents to deploy, and its IAM Policy Optimizer and AI-driven remediation make least-privilege actionable. It is a deserving runner-up to Wiz: very close in platform breadth and agentless philosophy, slightly behind on depth of dedicated identity tooling.

Pros

  • Truly agentless CIEM via patented SideScanning, with no agents, connectors, or code running in your environment, onboarding in minutes and zero workload performance impact
  • CIEM lives inside the same unified data model as posture, workload, vulnerability, malware, and data-security findings, so identity risk is automatically scored within attack-path analysis
  • Actionable least-privilege: the IAM Policy Optimizer compares granted policies against actual usage over the prior 90 days, AI-driven remediation prescribes the minimum change, and AWS just-in-time access is supported

Cons

  • CIEM is not licensed as a standalone product, so buyers who want only entitlement management pay for and adopt the whole CNAPP
  • Dedicated identity-graph depth and non-human-identity tooling, while improving, are not as specialized as identity-first competitors like Britive or the ex-Ermetic engine in Tenable
Honest Weakness: Orca's CIEM is a feature of a platform rather than a purpose-built identity product, and that cuts both ways. You get excellent cross-domain context, but you cannot buy CIEM a la carte, and the right-sizing and remediation workflows, though AI-assisted, still lean on the analyst to approve and apply changes rather than offering deep identity-native just-in-time brokering or session-level access governance. Agentless SideScanning also means entitlement analysis is built from periodic snapshots and cloud-provider IAM data, so it is excellent for posture and usage-based right-sizing but is not a continuous real-time identity-broker control plane. Buyers whose primary pain is identity governance alone may find a specialist tool a sharper fit.

Multi-Cloud Entitlement Visibility

Orca's CIEM provides full coverage of cloud identities, both human and non-human, across AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Alibaba Cloud, and Kubernetes, with the platform also reaching container registries and serverless environments. All of this visibility is collected agentlessly through Orca's patented SideScanning technology, which reads cloud configuration and runtime metadata out-of-band without deploying agents or running code in the customer environment. Because every account and identity feeds the same unified data model, entitlements from each provider are normalized into one inventory rather than being siloed per cloud. This gives security teams a single, consistent view of who and what can access which resources across a fragmented multi-cloud estate, and the agentless model means new accounts can be onboarded in minutes.

Least-Privilege and Right-Sizing

Orca operationalizes least privilege through its IAM Policy Optimizer, which compares each identity's granted IAM policies against its actual usage over the previous 90 days and recommends a tightened policy that preserves only the permissions in real use. Orca's own research found that among recently used AWS IAM roles, only about 55% of granted policy permissions were actually exercised, so usage-based right-sizing typically removes a large block of standing privilege without breaking functionality. Layered on top, AI-driven IAM Remediation performs prescriptive analytics to find the fewest policy changes needed for the greatest posture improvement, and for AWS, Orca supports just-in-time access that grants time-bound, role-specific permissions only when needed. The net effect is that recommendations are grounded in observed behavior rather than theoretical modeling, which reduces the false-positive churn that makes right-sizing programs stall.

Identity Risk and Toxic Combinations

Where Orca differentiates is treating entitlement risk not as a standalone hygiene score but as one input to platform-wide attack-path analysis. The CIEM engine flags classic identity risks -- privileged roles with cross-account trust, inactive IAM roles that still hold admin privileges, unattached privileged policies, and internet-exposed assets that carry privileged permissions -- and then, because identity data shares the unified data model with vulnerability, misconfiguration, malware, and sensitive-data findings, Orca correlates them into toxic combinations. Its attack-path engine recognizes when individually low-severity issues chain into a direct route to critical assets, then applies a granular risk score so teams remediate the few paths that actually matter. This context is the core argument for consuming CIEM inside Orca's CNAPP, since an over-permissioned role is scored very differently when it sits on an internet-facing, vulnerable workload than when it does not.

Custom / contact sales (per-workload; CIEM bundled into the CNAPP)

Visit Orca Security
3

Tenable Cloud Security (formerly Ermetic)

Best for Enterprise

Best for: Identity-first enterprise CIEM with just-in-time access

Tenable Cloud Security is the rebuilt Ermetic platform (Ermetic was acquired by Tenable in 2023), and it remains one of the most mature, identity-first CIEM engines on the market. It maps human and machine identities to excessive permissions and hidden access paths across AWS, Azure, and GCP, then drives least privilege and just-in-time access to cut standing access. It now sits inside Tenable's CNAPP and the wider Tenable One exposure-management platform.

Pros

  • Deep, identity-first entitlement analysis inherited from Ermetic, with mature access-path mapping for human and machine identities
  • Built-in just-in-time access tied to business justification to eliminate standing privileges
  • Automated and assisted remediation to remove risky entitlements and fix correlated misconfigurations at scale

Cons

  • CIEM is now packaged within the Tenable CNAPP and Tenable One rather than as the standalone Ermetic product buyers may remember
  • Post-acquisition, the experience and branding have been folded into Tenable's stack, which can mean a heavier platform commitment
Honest Weakness: The biggest practical caveat is the acquisition itself: Ermetic no longer exists as a standalone purchase, and its excellent CIEM is now one capability inside Tenable Cloud Security and Tenable One. Teams that loved Ermetic as a focused tool now buy into a larger Tenable platform and its commercial and operational footprint. While the underlying entitlement engine is among the strongest available, the surrounding CNAPP and exposure-management framing may be more than a pure-CIEM buyer wants. Pricing is fully custom and not published, so standalone-CIEM cost is hard to benchmark.

Multi-Cloud Entitlement Visibility

Tenable takes an explicitly identity-first approach, mapping every human and machine identity across AWS, Azure, and GCP to its effective permissions and the access paths those permissions open to critical assets. The platform normalizes entitlements across the three major clouds so over-privilege can be reasoned about consistently rather than per-provider. Because identity analysis is woven into the broader Tenable One exposure model, entitlement findings sit alongside vulnerability and configuration data. This unified view is what lets enterprises see identity as one dimension of overall cloud risk.

Least-Privilege and Right-Sizing

Tenable enforces least privilege at scale through automated and assisted remediation that strips unintended entitlements and fixes the misconfigurations correlated with them. This combination of analysis plus remediation is the heart of the inherited Ermetic strength, and it is well suited to enterprises that need to demonstrably shrink the identity attack surface rather than just report on it. The platform maps each identity to its effective permissions so right-sizing is grounded in real access paths. The result is a measurable reduction in standing privilege.

Identity Risk and Toxic Combinations

Tenable also supports just-in-time access, granting fine-grained, time-limited permissions based on business justification instead of long-standing privileges, which directly targets the standing-access problem that fuels lateral movement. It contextualizes risk by correlating misconfigurations with over-privileged identities to pinpoint the specific attack paths that matter most. Rather than treating identity hygiene as a flat checklist, it prioritizes the chains where excessive permissions plus a misconfiguration plus a reachable sensitive resource create real exposure. Because just-in-time access is native to the same platform doing the entitlement analysis, the what-access-exists and what-access-to-grant-temporarily questions share one data model.

Custom / contact sales (bundled into Tenable Cloud Security and Tenable One)

Visit Tenable Cloud Security (formerly Ermetic)
4

Sonrai Security

Best Value

Best for: Active least-privilege enforcement

Sonrai has repositioned around its Cloud Permissions Firewall, which it bills as the industry's first, automatically blocking unused privileges using cloud-native org-level guardrails (AWS SCPs and RCPs and equivalents) with minimal disruption. It is the strongest enforcement-first CIEM story here, delivering cloud PAM across human, machine, and AI identities. Customers report cutting their permissions attack surface by more than 90%.

Pros

  • The Cloud Permissions Firewall enforces default-deny least privilege via native org-level policies, not just recommendations
  • One-click, low-disruption deployment that customers credit with attack-surface reductions of more than 90%
  • Covers human, machine, and AI and non-human identities across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud

Cons

  • Enforcement via org-level cloud-native policies is powerful but demands careful rollout to avoid breaking workloads
  • Narrower than full CNAPP rivals like Wiz, Orca, and Tenable if you also want vulnerability and workload coverage in one tool
Honest Weakness: Sonrai's enforcement-first model is its greatest strength and its biggest operational risk: applying default-deny guardrails through SCPs and RCPs at the org level is exactly what makes the 90% reduction possible, but it also means misconfiguration can block legitimate access if rollout is rushed. The one-click and zero-disruption framing is vendor language; in practice, enterprises should pilot carefully and validate that automated blocking does not interrupt critical automation or service identities. Sonrai is also more identity-focused than the broad CNAPP platforms, so it is a complement to, not a replacement for, workload and vulnerability tooling. As with peers, pricing is not public.

Multi-Cloud Entitlement Visibility

Sonrai extends its identity model across human, machine, and increasingly AI identities on AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, continuously analyzing real permission usage across all of them. Rather than producing a static inventory, it builds a live picture of which privileges are actually used so unused access can be identified and removed. This usage-driven visibility is the foundation for its enforcement model. The focus is identity and permissions rather than the broad workload-and-vulnerability scope of the CNAPP players.

Least-Privilege and Right-Sizing

Sonrai continuously analyzes real permission usage across all identities and automatically blocks unused privileges using cloud-native, org-level policies, making permissions dynamic and on-demand. Rather than producing a report of over-privileged roles, the Cloud Permissions Firewall applies centralized default-deny guardrails so identities only hold access when actively needed. This is enforcement, not advice, which is the core distinction from visibility-led CIEM. Sonrai cites customer attack-surface reductions of more than 90% from this model.

Identity Risk and Toxic Combinations

By focusing on blocking the unused privileges attackers exploit, Sonrai neutralizes many toxic-combination paths at the permission layer, taking a more preventative posture than detection-led tools. Independent testing reportedly found the Cloud Permissions Firewall blocked 16 of 16 AWS attack paths it tested, which speaks to its effectiveness against real lateral-movement scenarios. Because permissions become on-demand under the firewall model, access is granted dynamically when an identity legitimately needs it and otherwise denied by default, effectively delivering just-in-time behavior as a property of the enforcement engine. Reviewers should validate that the request and approval experience fits their operational model during a pilot.

Custom / contact sales (also available via AWS Marketplace)

Visit Sonrai Security
5

Britive

Honorable Mention

Best for: Dedicated just-in-time access and zero standing privileges

Britive is a purpose-built, cloud-native CIEM and cloud-PAM platform centered on just-in-time access and zero standing privileges, using an agentless, API-first architecture across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI. It is the most focused dedicated-CIEM story on this list and was named a 2025 Global InfoSec Award winner for cloud PAM. The trade-off is that it is a smaller vendor and less of a broad-spectrum platform than the CNAPP players.

Pros

  • True just-in-time access with zero standing privileges across all identities, the modern CIEM endgame
  • Agentless, proxy-less, API-first architecture that deploys without slowing enterprise environments
  • First-class support for non-human and AI-agent identities alongside humans, across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI

Cons

  • Smaller, more specialized vendor than Wiz, Orca, or Tenable; not a full CNAPP, so no native vulnerability or workload coverage
  • Focused on access provisioning and PAM, so it pairs with, rather than replaces, visibility-led CIEM and posture tooling
Honest Weakness: Britive's focus is also its limitation: it is excellent at the provisioning and enforcement side of CIEM (just-in-time, ephemeral permissions, zero standing privileges) but it is not a broad cloud-security posture or attack-path-graph platform like Wiz or Tenable. Buyers wanting one tool to both find identity risk in context and eliminate standing access will likely run Britive alongside a CNAPP rather than instead of one. As a smaller independent vendor, it also carries more roadmap and longevity uncertainty than the larger players, and its enterprise feature depth outside access management is comparatively thin. Pricing is not public, so budgeting requires a sales conversation.

Multi-Cloud Entitlement Visibility

Britive natively spans AWS, Azure, GCP, and Oracle Cloud, and integrates with identity providers such as Okta and Entra ID to unify access policy across them. It manages tens of millions of identities and emphasizes a single control plane for cross-cloud privileged access. This unified, provider-agnostic model is aimed at organizations facing identity sprawl across many clouds. It is more about consistent access control than the deep posture-graph visualization Wiz and Orca offer.

Least-Privilege and Right-Sizing

Britive's core is dynamic, time-bound access that grants permissions only when needed and automatically revokes them after use, eliminating standing privileges. This zero-standing-privileges model directly attacks the persistent-credential problem that drives most cloud identity breaches. Because it is delivered agentlessly and via API, it can enforce least privilege across multiple clouds without proxies or installed agents. Britive has been recognized in Gartner CIEM reporting and won a 2025 Global InfoSec Award in the cloud PAM category for this approach.

Identity Risk and Toxic Combinations

Britive extends its access model to non-human identities, including AI agents, AI workflows, API keys, and workloads, which are a fast-growing source of unmanaged cloud risk. By eliminating standing privileges for these identities, it removes the dormant over-permissioned accounts that often anchor toxic-combination attack paths. The emphasis is preventative, shrinking what an attacker could ever use, rather than after-the-fact detection. This makes it a strong complement to graph-based identity-risk tools.

Custom / contact sales (standalone dedicated CIEM / cloud PAM)

Visit Britive

Which One Should You Pick?

Use CaseOur Recommendation
Reduce standing privileges and stop lateral movement across many cloudsBritive (just-in-time plus zero standing privileges) or Tenable Cloud Security (native just-in-time inside a CNAPP) are the strongest fits for eliminating persistent access.
Prioritize the few identity risks that form real attack paths to crown-jewel dataWiz, whose Security Graph correlates entitlements with vulnerabilities, exposure, and data sensitivity, or Orca, whose unified data model scores identity risk within platform-wide attack-path analysis.
Actively enforce least privilege (not just report it) with minimal DevOps disruptionSonrai Security's Cloud Permissions Firewall applies default-deny least privilege via native SCP and RCP guardrails, the strongest enforcement-first option here.
Adopt agentless CIEM with no agents or connectors to deploy across a fragmented estateOrca Security's SideScanning collects identity and entitlement data out-of-band, onboarding new accounts in minutes with zero workload performance impact.
Consolidate CIEM with posture, workload protection, and vulnerability management in one platformWiz, Orca, or Tenable Cloud Security all deliver CIEM as one module of a broader CNAPP or exposure-management platform.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between CIEM, CSPM, and CNAPP?
CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management) finds misconfigurations in cloud resources and services, like an open storage bucket or a disabled log. CIEM (Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management) focuses specifically on identities and permissions -- who and what can do what, and where access is excessive or unused. CNAPP (Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform) is the umbrella platform that combines CSPM, CIEM, workload protection, and often vulnerability and data security into one tool. In practice, CIEM is the identity pillar inside a CNAPP, and tools like Wiz, Orca, and Tenable deliver CIEM as one capability of a larger platform, while Sonrai and Britive offer more focused, dedicated identity-security products.
Why does CIEM matter now?
Cloud permissions have sprawled far beyond what any team can manage by hand: every human, service account, workload, and now AI agent accumulates entitlements, most of which go unused. That unused, over-broad access is exactly what attackers exploit to move laterally and reach sensitive data, which is why identity has become known as the new perimeter. CIEM exists to continuously measure the gap between permissions granted and permissions actually used, then shrink it toward least privilege. As non-human and AI identities now vastly outnumber humans in most clouds, manual review is impossible and automated CIEM becomes essential.
Do these tools cover AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud equally?
All five support the big three clouds, but depth varies. Wiz, Orca, Tenable Cloud Security, Sonrai, and Britive offer broad multi-cloud coverage, and several also add Oracle Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, Kubernetes, and SaaS and data platforms. Some advanced features remain cloud-specific, for example just-in-time access that is implemented first for AWS in certain products, so confirm parity for your specific cloud mix. Because each cloud models IAM differently, the real test is how well a tool normalizes effective permissions across providers, which is a core part of what you are buying.
Should I buy standalone CIEM or CIEM bundled into a CNAPP, and what happened to Ermetic?
If you already run, or plan to run, a CNAPP for posture and workload security, getting CIEM bundled (Wiz, Orca, Tenable) gives you identity risk ranked in the context of vulnerabilities and exposure, which is hard to beat for prioritization. If your priority is active enforcement or just-in-time access, a focused tool like Sonrai or Britive can go deeper on eliminating standing privileges. On Ermetic specifically, it was a well-regarded standalone CIEM and CNAPP vendor that Tenable acquired in 2023, and it is now sold as Tenable Cloud Security as part of Tenable One, so Ermetic no longer exists as a standalone purchase even though its strong identity-first engine lives on inside Tenable.

Related Comparisons