Skip to content

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8-Max

Facts only. This page does not pick a winner. For a picked winner, see the use case comparison on Tools.

Claude Opus 5Qwen3.8-Max
API model IDsclaude-opus-5qwen3.8-max, qwen3.8-max-0902, qwen3.8-max-2026-09-02
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Lifecycleactiveactive
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
Trains on API dataNoNo
Zero data retentionon-requestno
Input per 1M tokens$5 (verified 2026-09-08)$2 (verified 2026-09-08)

Frequently asked questions

Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.8-Max?
Claude Opus 5 holds 1,000,000 tokens and Qwen3.8-Max holds 1,000,000. Both hold 1,000,000 tokens. The context window counts the prompt, any attached files, and the reply together.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.8-Max?
Per million input tokens, Claude Opus 5 was $5 (verified 2026-09-08) and Qwen3.8-Max was $2 (verified 2026-09-08). Qwen3.8-Max is cheaper per input token. Output tokens cost $25 and $6 respectively, and output volume usually decides the bill.
Does Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.8-Max train on API data?
Claude Opus 5 does not train on API data by default, and Qwen3.8-Max does not train on API data by default. Zero data retention is on-request for Claude Opus 5 and no for Qwen3.8-Max. Verified 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-08 against the providers' own documentation.
Is Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.8-Max being retired?
Claude Opus 5 is active. Qwen3.8-Max is active. Lifecycle checked 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-08. Pin a dated snapshot ID rather than an alias if a retirement would break you.