Top 5 AI Gateways 2026: Kong vs Portkey vs LiteLLM vs Cloudflare vs Helicone
AI gateways compared: Kong AI Gateway, Portkey, LiteLLM, Cloudflare AI Gateway, and Helicone. Routing, caching, budgeting, observability, and the security controls every production LLM application needs.
Quick Comparison
| Gateway | Best For | Deployment | Providers | Pricing Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kong AI Gateway | Enterprise API platform standardization | Self-hosted + Kong Konnect | 30+ | Enterprise license + usage |
| Portkey | Production LLM apps wanting routing + observability | Cloud + self-hosted | 200+ | Free tier + usage-based |
| LiteLLM | OSS gateway with maximum provider compatibility | Self-hosted (open source) | 100+ | Free; LiteLLM Enterprise tier |
| Cloudflare AI Gateway | Cloudflare-hosted apps with simple AI proxy needs | Cloudflare-only | 10+ major | Generous free tier + Workers usage |
| Helicone | Open-source observability with light gateway | Cloud + self-hosted OSS | 100+ via proxy | Free tier + per-request pricing |
Kong AI Gateway
Best for EnterpriseBest for: Enterprise API platform standardization with AI traffic alongside traditional APIs
“Kong AI Gateway extends Kong's established API gateway platform into AI traffic. For enterprises already running Kong for API management, the AI Gateway is the right path — same operational model, same observability pipeline, same security controls. For greenfield AI-only deployments without Kong commitment, Portkey or LiteLLM are usually better fits.”
Pros
- Built on the established Kong API gateway with enterprise-grade operational maturity
- Native plugins for prompt injection defense, semantic caching, rate limiting, and cost budgets
- Unified observability for AI and traditional API traffic in one operational pipeline
- Strong fit for organizations standardizing API management at enterprise scale
Cons
- Enterprise pricing model assumes organizational commitment to the Kong platform
- More operational complexity than purpose-built AI-only gateways
- Less LLM-provider feature parity than Portkey or LiteLLM in some edge cases
Enterprise API Platform Integration
The AI Gateway runs as a Kong plugin set on the same gateway infrastructure that handles traditional API traffic. For organizations with existing Kong deployments, the operational model — admin API, declarative configuration, observability via Kong's stack — extends to AI traffic without parallel infrastructure. The integration value is the operational consistency, not raw AI-specific features.
Security Plugins for LLM Traffic
Built-in plugins handle prompt injection scanning, semantic caching with vector embeddings, request validation against expected schemas, cost budgets per consumer, and rate limiting per token volume. The security plugin set is the most enterprise-mature in the AI gateway category, fitting compliance-conscious deployments.
Kong Konnect from approximately $500-2,500/month; Enterprise pricing on request
Visit Kong AI GatewayPortkey
Best OverallBest for: Production LLM applications wanting routing, observability, and cost control without operating infrastructure
“Portkey is the most-feature-complete commercial AI gateway in 2026. The platform combines routing across 200+ LLM providers, prompt caching, fallback chains, observability, and cost budgets in a managed cloud offering. For production LLM apps that want to avoid operating gateway infrastructure, Portkey is the leading choice; for teams committed to self-hosting, LiteLLM is the open-source equivalent.”
Pros
- Broadest LLM provider coverage in the category — 200+ providers and model families
- Production routing features including fallbacks, load balancing, and semantic caching
- Strong observability with prompt-level traces, cost tracking, and evaluation tooling
- Cloud-managed deployment with low operational overhead
Cons
- Cloud-only deployment for the managed offering; self-hosted available but less seamless than LiteLLM
- Pricing scales with request volume — meaningful line item for high-throughput applications
- Some advanced features (guardrails, evaluations) gated to higher pricing tiers
Routing and Fallback Chains
Portkey's configuration model supports declarative routing rules — primary provider, fallback chain on error or latency threshold, semantic caching with embedding-based lookup, request transformation between provider schemas. The configuration is the gateway's strongest production feature; failover patterns that would be application-layer code in alternative deployments become gateway configuration in Portkey.
Observability and Evaluation
The observability layer captures every prompt, completion, latency, token count, and cost per request. Built-in evaluations (groundedness, faithfulness, custom evaluators) score completions against quality criteria; the evaluation results feed into the routing decisions. For production teams running A/B tests across model providers, the integrated evaluation-and-routing loop reduces application-layer experiment infrastructure.
Free tier with 10K requests/month; usage-based pricing from $49/month for production tier
Visit PortkeyLiteLLM
Best Open SourceBest for: Open-source AI gateway with maximum provider compatibility for self-hosted production
“LiteLLM is the dominant open-source AI gateway in 2026. The project's provider compatibility is the broadest of any open-source option (100+ providers across OpenAI-compatible APIs and native integrations), and the self-hosted deployment is straightforward. For teams committed to self-hosting AI infrastructure, LiteLLM is the default choice.”
Pros
- Open source (MIT) with broad provider compatibility across 100+ LLM providers
- Self-hosted deployment is operationally simple — Docker container plus configuration
- OpenAI-compatible interface means existing OpenAI SDK code works against any provider
- Active community and commercial backing from BerriAI with LiteLLM Enterprise tier
Cons
- Observability and management UI less polished than Portkey or commercial alternatives
- Enterprise features (SSO, audit logs, advanced budgets) gated to LiteLLM Enterprise tier
- Configuration complexity grows with feature surface — production deployments often non-trivial
OpenAI-Compatible Universal Interface
LiteLLM exposes an OpenAI-compatible API surface for any backing provider — Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, Cohere, Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, local models via Ollama or vLLM, dozens more. Existing application code using the OpenAI SDK works against LiteLLM as the backend without modification, which makes provider migration and multi-provider deployment materially easier than direct integration with each provider's SDK.
Self-Hosted Deployment Model
Production deployment is a Docker container plus a YAML configuration describing providers, routing rules, budgets, and rate limits. The deployment fits Kubernetes, ECS, plain Docker, or any container orchestration; the operational model is similar to any HTTP proxy. For organizations preferring self-hosted infrastructure over managed services, the deployment is materially simpler than running Kong or building equivalent capability.
Free (open source, MIT); LiteLLM Enterprise tier with commercial pricing
Visit LiteLLMCloudflare AI Gateway
Best Free OptionBest for: Cloudflare-hosted applications with simple AI proxy and caching needs
“Cloudflare AI Gateway is the right choice when the application already runs on Cloudflare Workers, Pages, or other Cloudflare infrastructure. The gateway runs at the edge, integrates natively with Workers, and ships with a generous free tier. For applications outside the Cloudflare ecosystem, the value proposition is weaker — purpose-built AI gateways have richer features.”
Pros
- Generous free tier — 100K requests/day at no cost
- Runs at Cloudflare's edge with low latency for globally-distributed clients
- Native integration with Cloudflare Workers, Workers AI, R2, and the broader Cloudflare stack
- Built-in caching, rate limiting, and basic observability
Cons
- Provider coverage limited to major LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Google, a handful more) versus 100+ on alternatives
- Lock-in to Cloudflare infrastructure — applications outside Cloudflare derive less value
- Advanced features (evaluations, prompt management, complex routing) are less mature than Portkey or LiteLLM
Cloudflare Stack Integration
AI Gateway runs at Cloudflare's edge network alongside Workers, Pages, R2, D1, and the broader Cloudflare platform. For applications built on this stack, the integration is operationally tight — observability flows into Cloudflare's analytics, caching uses Cloudflare's KV or D1, and the gateway is configured through the same dashboard as the rest of the infrastructure. The value scales with Cloudflare commitment.
Edge Latency and Generous Free Tier
Running at the edge produces materially lower latency than going through a centralized gateway in one cloud region, particularly for globally-distributed user bases. The 100K-requests-per-day free tier is the most generous in the category; for moderate-volume applications, the gateway is functionally free.
Free tier with 100K requests/day; usage-based pricing for higher volume integrated with Workers pricing
Visit Cloudflare AI GatewayHelicone
Runner UpBest for: Open-source LLM observability with light AI gateway functionality
“Helicone is primarily an LLM observability platform with AI gateway functionality added via its proxy mode. The observability is the strength — production-quality traces, cost tracking, prompt versioning. The gateway capabilities (routing, caching, rate limiting) are present but less mature than the dedicated gateway alternatives.”
Pros
- Best LLM observability of any AI gateway — production-quality traces, evaluations, cost tracking
- Open source (Apache 2.0) with self-hosted deployment option
- Proxy mode adds gateway functionality (caching, rate limiting, basic routing) on top of observability
- Strong fit when observability is the primary need and gateway is secondary
Cons
- Gateway capabilities (routing, fallbacks, complex caching) less mature than Portkey or LiteLLM
- Proxy-based deployment adds latency that direct gateway integration avoids
- Pricing model based on observability events rather than gateway requests — different cost profile
LLM Observability Depth
Helicone's observability captures every LLM call with full prompt, completion, latency, token counts, and cost, indexed for searchable analysis. Production teams running thousands of LLM calls per minute use the dashboard to identify regression in prompt quality, latency spikes, cost outliers, and provider error patterns. The observability is the platform's primary value.
Proxy Mode Gateway Functionality
Routing requests through Helicone's proxy enables basic gateway functionality — caching with semantic similarity, rate limiting per user or key, basic provider fallback. For applications where observability is the primary need and gateway features are useful additions, the proxy mode delivers both in one deployment; for applications where the gateway is the primary need, dedicated alternatives are usually better fits.
Free tier with 10K requests/month; usage-based pricing from $20/month for production
Visit HeliconeWhich One Should You Pick?
| Use Case | Our Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Production LLM application wanting routing across multiple providers with managed observability | Portkey for the managed-cloud option; LiteLLM for the self-hosted equivalent. Both provide broad provider coverage; the choice is managed-vs-self-hosted preference. |
| Application built on Cloudflare Workers with AI proxy and caching needs | Cloudflare AI Gateway — native integration plus generous free tier makes this the obvious choice when already on Cloudflare. Outside Cloudflare, the value proposition is weaker. |
| Enterprise with existing Kong API gateway standardization | Kong AI Gateway to maintain operational consistency with traditional API traffic. For organizations without Kong commitment, the operational overhead is mismatched to the actual need. |
| Open-source self-hosted gateway with maximum provider compatibility | LiteLLM — the dominant OSS AI gateway with broad provider support and OpenAI-compatible interface. Helicone OSS as the secondary option when observability is the primary need. |
| LLM observability as the primary need with light gateway capability | Helicone for the observability-first deployment. For dedicated LLM observability without gateway needs, see the Top 5 LLM Observability Platforms 2026 comparison. |
| High-throughput application optimizing for gateway cost | Cloudflare AI Gateway for the generous free tier and edge-latency benefits; LiteLLM self-hosted for the no-incremental-cost-per-request model; cost modeling against expected traffic essential before committing. |
| Multi-provider production with prompt injection defense requirements | Kong AI Gateway for the most mature security plugin set; Portkey as the managed-cloud alternative with guardrails. LiteLLM with separate guardrail integration for self-hosted with security. |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does an AI gateway actually do?
Do I need an AI gateway for a small LLM application?
Portkey vs LiteLLM — what's the real decision?
Why is Cloudflare AI Gateway so cheap?
How does an AI gateway interact with LLM observability platforms like Langfuse or LangSmith?
What about prompt injection defense in AI gateways?
Can I run multiple gateways or combine approaches?
Related Comparisons
AI Search Visibility
Best AI Search Visibility Tools for 2026: GrackerAI, HubSpot AEO, Profound, and More Compared
7 tools compared
LLM Frameworks
Top 10 MCP Servers and Agent Frameworks for Enterprise 2026
10 tools compared
LLM Observability
Top 5 LLM Observability Platforms 2026: Langfuse vs LangSmith vs Helicone vs Arize vs Weights & Biases
5 tools compared
Vector Database
Top 5 Vector Databases 2026: Pinecone vs Weaviate vs Qdrant vs Chroma vs pgvector
5 tools compared