Auth0 vs Curity.
Last verified 2026-05-07
When Auth0 wins
- Auth0 has fine-grained authorization (Zanzibar-style); Curity does not
- Auth0 has compliance: iso 27018; Curity does not
- Auth0 has user mgmt: progressive profiling; Curity does partially
- Auth0 has bot detection; Curity does not
- Auth0 has security: anomaly detection; Curity does partially
When Curity wins
- Curity has authz: abac; Auth0 does partially
- Curity has local emulator for development; Auth0 does not
- Curity has security: pii minimization; Auth0 does partially
- Curity has security: post quantum roadmap; Auth0 does not
- Curity has consent management; Auth0 does partially
- Curity has consent: preference center; Auth0 does partially
Both win
- Both support WebAuthn passkeys natively
- Both support social login at scale
- Both have SOC 2 Type II
Pricing comparison
| MAU band | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 MAU | $240/mo | Quote |
| 100,000 MAU | $1,200/mo | $4,500/mo |
| 500,000 MAU | $4,500/mo | $14,000/mo |
| 1,000,000 MAU | $9,500/mo | $25,000/mo |
Side-by-side capability matrix
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| Password authentication | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Social login | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Magic links | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SMS OTP | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Email OTP | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| TOTP (authenticator app) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Push MFA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| WebAuthn / passkeys | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Biometric | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Hardware security keys | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| OIDC SSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| OAuth 2.0 SSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Enterprise federation | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Passwordless-only flows | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Adaptive MFA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Step-up auth | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| RBAC | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| ABAC | ~ Partial | ✓ Yes |
| ReBAC | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| FGA engine | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| API authorization | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Fine-grained permissions | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| Self-service registration | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Progressive profiling | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Self-service account | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bulk user import | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Admin user search | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Custom user metadata | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Organizations / tenants | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Multi-tenancy | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| GraphQL API | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| SDKs | 16 listed | 6 listed |
| CLI | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Terraform provider | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Local emulator | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Extension model | Actions (Node.js serverless) | Plugins (Java) + Configuration as Code (XML / CLI) |
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| Bot detection | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Breached password detection | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Brute-force protection | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Anomaly detection | ✓ Yes | ~ Partial |
| Log streams | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Audit logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| GDPR data export | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| PII minimization | ~ Partial | ✓ Yes |
| Post-quantum roadmap | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| MCP support | ~ Partial | ~ Partial |
| OAuth 2.1 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Dynamic client registration | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Agent vs human token separation | ✕ No | ~ Partial |
| Web Bot Auth | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| ISO 27018 | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| HIPAA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| PCI DSS | Level 1 (with config) | ✕ No |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| CCPA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| FedRAMP | High (via Okta) | ✕ No |
| EU data residency | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Capability | Auth0 | Curity |
|---|---|---|
| Consent management | ~ Partial | ✓ Yes |
| Preference center | ~ Partial | ✓ Yes |
| Purpose-specific consent | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Integrates with CMPs | 2 listed | n/a |
FAQ
- How does Auth0 compare to Curity on pricing?
- Auth0 prices on tiered-mau; Curity prices on tiered-mau. See the pricing comparison table on this page for our editorial estimates at 10k / 100k / 500k / 1M MAU using the standard methodology assumptions.
- Should I switch from Auth0 to Curity?
- Switching is a 60–90 day exercise in either direction once SDK rewrites and hooks/Actions migration are accounted for. If your team is hitting cost or feature ceilings on Auth0, evaluate Curity on the specific axes flagged in the "When Curity wins" list. If you're operating well within Auth0, the switching cost rarely pays back.
- Do Auth0 and Curity both support passkeys?
- Both Auth0 and Curity support WebAuthn passkeys natively per public documentation. Adoption rates depend on orchestration quality (device-aware prompting, conditional UI), not raw protocol support, see the passwordless guide for the orchestration question.
This comparison is auto-generated from the underlying capability matrix and pricing data on each vendor's profile. Editorial verdict lists below are seeded heuristically from the matrix diff; a maintainer review refines them before the page goes public.