<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The CISO Desk</title>
    <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/</link>
    <description>Free, ungated decision briefs, dated benchmarks, and browser-only tools for security leaders who have to make a call and then defend it to a board.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>49% of Employees Use AI Tools Their Employer Has Not Sanctioned</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/shadow-ai-employee-usage/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/shadow-ai-employee-usage/</guid>
      <description>BlackFog and Sapio surveyed 2,000 UK and US employees: 49% use AI tools their employer has not approved. Governance starts from an inventory nobody has yet.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vulnerability Exploitation Passed Stolen Credentials as the Top Entry Point</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/vulnerability-exploitation-top-entry-point/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/vulnerability-exploitation-top-entry-point/</guid>
      <description>Verizon's 2026 DBIR put vulnerability exploitation at 31% of breach entry points, ahead of stolen credentials for the first time in 19 years of the report.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>48% of Breaches Involved a Third Party</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/third-party-breach-involvement/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/third-party-breach-involvement/</guid>
      <description>Verizon's 2026 DBIR puts third-party involvement in nearly half of all breaches, with supply chain breaches up 60%. The case for vendor review, and its limit.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Machine Identities Outnumber Humans by More Than 80 to 1</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/machine-identities-outnumber-humans/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/machine-identities-outnumber-humans/</guid>
      <description>CyberArk puts machine identities at roughly 82 per human. The sharper finding: 88% define privileged access as human-only, while 42% of machines hold it.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Security Market Grows 12.5%. Buyer Budgets Grow 4%.</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-market-vs-buyer-budget-growth/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-market-vs-buyer-budget-growth/</guid>
      <description>Gartner projects $240B in 2026 security spending, up 12.5%. IANS finds CISO budgets growing 4%. Both can be true only if spend is concentrating.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Security Fell to 10.9% of IT Spend, Down From 11.9%</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-share-of-it-budget/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-share-of-it-budget/</guid>
      <description>IANS and Artico Search surveyed 587 CISOs: security fell from 11.9% to 10.9% of IT budget, and budget growth slowed to 4%, the lowest in five years.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>74% of B2B Buying Teams Show Unhealthy Conflict While Deciding</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/b2b-buying-team-conflict/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/b2b-buying-team-conflict/</guid>
      <description>Gartner found unhealthy conflict inside three quarters of B2B buying teams. The deal is usually lost inside the committee, not to a competitor.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>67% of B2B Buyers Prefer a Rep-Free Buying Experience</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/b2b-buyers-prefer-rep-free/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/b2b-buyers-prefer-rep-free/</guid>
      <description>Gartner's 2026 survey found 67% of B2B buyers prefer to evaluate without a sales rep, up from 61%. The shortlist exists before first contact.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A B2B Buying Group Runs 5 to 16 People Across Four Functions</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-buying-committee-size/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-buying-committee-size/</guid>
      <description>Gartner puts the modern B2B buying group at five to sixteen people spanning as many as four functions. Security purchases sit at the top of that range.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>58% of Organizations Run More Than 25 Security Tools</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-tool-sprawl-25-tools/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/benchmarks/security-tool-sprawl-25-tools/</guid>
      <description>Wiz surveyed 300+ security leaders for its 2026 budget benchmark: 58% run more than 25 security tools, and nearly half say sprawl is holding the program back.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When a SaaS Company Needs a Head of Security</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/when-saas-needs-head-of-security/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/when-saas-needs-head-of-security/</guid>
      <description>The usual advice ties this to headcount or revenue. Both are wrong. The trigger is the week security work stops being project-shaped and becomes a queue nobody can drain.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Actually Triggers a Security Budget Line</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/what-triggers-a-security-budget-line/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/what-triggers-a-security-budget-line/</guid>
      <description>New security spend is almost never caused by a persuasive case. It is caused by an event with a date on it. Knowing which five events do it changes when you ask, not how.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Auditors Actually Test in Identity</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/what-auditors-test-in-identity/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/what-auditors-test-in-identity/</guid>
      <description>Auditors do not evaluate your identity architecture. They pick names off a list and ask you to prove what happened. Elegant design earns nothing if the record is missing.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 30-Day Security Tool Rationalization Playbook</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/tool-rationalization-playbook/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/tool-rationalization-playbook/</guid>
      <description>58% of organizations run more than 25 security tools. This is the four-week program for finding the overlap, deciding what goes, and freeing budget without creating a hole.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Engineer Who Killed Your Deal Was Never on a Call</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/the-quiet-veto/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/the-quiet-veto/</guid>
      <description>The most consequential opinion in a security evaluation is usually formed in a private message by someone the vendor never met. Both sides of the deal should understand how that works.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Founder-CISO Problem</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/the-founder-ciso-problem/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/the-founder-ciso-problem/</guid>
      <description>A technical founder holding security has one real advantage nobody else has, and one disadvantage that compounds. Knowing which is which decides when to hand it over.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Cost of Identity Debt at Scale</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/the-cost-of-identity-debt/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/the-cost-of-identity-debt/</guid>
      <description>Identity debt never arrives as a security incident. It arrives as onboarding that takes nine days, an audit finding that recurs, and a migration estimated at one quarter that takes three.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SOC 2 as a Sales Gate, Not a Compliance Project</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/soc-2-as-a-sales-gate/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/soc-2-as-a-sales-gate/</guid>
      <description>For most B2B software companies SOC 2 is a sales requirement wearing compliance clothing. Reading it correctly changes three decisions: scope, timing against pipeline, and which exceptions you can live with.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Security Questionnaire Is a Sales Weapon, Not a Compliance Chore</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/security-questionnaire-sales-weapon/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/security-questionnaire-sales-weapon/</guid>
      <description>Vendors treat questionnaires as overhead. Buyers treat them as diligence. Both readings are wrong: a questionnaire is the cheapest way one side of a deal shifts work onto the other.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Run a Security Evaluation That Actually Decides</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/run-a-security-evaluation/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/run-a-security-evaluation/</guid>
      <description>Most security evaluations do not end in a bad purchase. They end in no purchase, six months later, with nobody able to say what happened. The failure is procedural, and it is fixable in the first two weeks.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Product Security and Corporate Security Are Different Jobs</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/product-vs-corporate-security/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/product-vs-corporate-security/</guid>
      <description>A software company runs two security programs and funds them as one line. They have different customers, different failure modes, and different people, and merging them starves one of them.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The POC Scorecard: 14 Criteria That Predict Production Behavior</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/poc-scorecard/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/poc-scorecard/</guid>
      <description>Most POCs are scored on whether the product worked. That is the wrong question, because the vendor configured it. These fourteen criteria are the ones that predict month twelve.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should You Run a POC or Trust the Reference Call?</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/poc-or-reference-call/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/poc-or-reference-call/</guid>
      <description>A proof of concept costs weeks of engineering time you are not accounting for. Two good reference calls cost ninety minutes. The choice turns on one question: is the failure you care about visible from outside?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orphaned Agents: When the Person Who Built Them Leaves</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/orphaned-agents/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/orphaned-agents/</guid>
      <description>An agent built by an engineer who left still holds credentials and still takes actions. Your offboarding checklist was designed for accounts a human logs into, and this is not one.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Non-Human Identity Is a Governance Problem Before It Is a Tooling Problem</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/non-human-identity-governance-first/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/non-human-identity-governance-first/</guid>
      <description>Buy a non-human identity tool first and you get a list of eleven thousand identities nobody owns. The ownership decision has to come before the discovery, and it is unglamorous policy work.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Killing a Tool: The Murder Board Nobody Runs</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/killing-a-tool-murder-board/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/killing-a-tool-murder-board/</guid>
      <description>Security teams buy well and retire badly, which is how a stack reaches thirty tools. A murder board is the two-hour structure that makes a retirement decision defensible before it happens.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IGA, PAM, or ITDR First?</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/iga-pam-or-itdr-first/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/iga-pam-or-itdr-first/</guid>
      <description>Three identity categories compete for the same budget line and vendors in each will tell you theirs comes first. The sequence is decided by which failure you can already evidence.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Identity Chapter of a Security Program, in Plain Budget Terms</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/identity-budget-in-plain-terms/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/identity-budget-in-plain-terms/</guid>
      <description>Identity is usually the biggest line in a security budget and the one a CFO understands least. Four cost centres, what each one actually buys, and how to defend the total.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Your First Security Hire Is Not an Engineer</title>
      <link>https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/first-security-hire-is-not-an-engineer/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guptadeepak.com/ciso/first-security-hire-is-not-an-engineer/</guid>
      <description>Founders hire a strong application security engineer into the first security role and get an unhappy engineer doing spreadsheet work while the queue keeps growing. The job is program work.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
